584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15569881)
1. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.
Willinek WA; von Falkenhausen M; Born M; Gieseke J; Höller T; Klockgether T; Textor HJ; Schild HH; Urbach H
Stroke; 2005 Jan; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15569881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease.
Wright VL; Olan W; Dick B; Yu H; Alberts-Grill N; Latour LL; Baird AE
Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16009882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
Lin J; Li D; Yan F
Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery.
Scarabino T; Fossaceca R; Carra L; Florio F; Marano G; Carriero A
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
Butz B; Dorenbeck U; Borisch I; Zorger N; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S; Link J
Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15191100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-enhanced, ECG-gated MR angiography of the pedal vasculature: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Schubert T; Takes M; Aschwanden M; Klarhoefer M; Haas T; Jacob AL; Liu D; Gutzeit A; Kos S
Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2705-13. PubMed ID: 26515548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unmasking pedal arteries in patients with critical ischemia using time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA.
Langer S; Krämer N; Mommertz G; Koeppel TA; Jacobs MJ; Wazirie NA; Ocklenburg C; Spüntrup E
J Vasc Surg; 2009 May; 49(5):1196-202. PubMed ID: 19394548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Deutschmann HA; Schoellnast H; Portugaller HR; Preidler KW; Reittner P; Tillich M; Pilger E; Szolar DH
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 16625410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Highly accelerated compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography may be reliable for diagnosing head and neck arterial steno-occlusive disease: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.
Zhang X; Cao YZ; Mu XH; Sun Y; Schmidt M; Forman C; Speier P; Lu SS; Hong XN
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3059-3065. PubMed ID: 32064562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].
Schäfer FK; Schäfer PJ; Jahnke T; Walluscheck K; Priebe M; Hentsch A; Heller M; Brossmann J
Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 12677513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
