These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15570569)

  • 1. Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings.
    Barnhart HX; Song J; Haber MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1371-84. PubMed ID: 15570569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coefficients of agreement for fixed observers.
    Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2006 Jun; 15(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 16768299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new permutation-based method for assessing agreement between two observers making replicated quantitative readings.
    Pan Y; Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2249-61. PubMed ID: 22415910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of individual agreement in assessing agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Lokhnygina Y; Kosinski AS; Haber M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):721-38. PubMed ID: 17613650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of laser Doppler flowmetry curve reading for measurement of toe and ankle pressures: intra- and inter-observer variation.
    Høyer C; Paludan JP; Pavar S; Biurrun Manresa JA; Petersen LJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Mar; 47(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 24445083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Measurements by DSA: Comparison of the NASCET and WASID Methods.
    Chen L; Zhan Q; Ma C; Liu Q; Zhang X; Tian X; Jiang Y; Dong Y; Chen S; Lu J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130991. PubMed ID: 26115309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers.
    Barnhart HX; Haber M; Song J
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1020-7. PubMed ID: 12495158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing individual agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS; Haber MJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):697-719. PubMed ID: 17613649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing agreement with repeated measures for random observers.
    Chen CC; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(30):3546-59. PubMed ID: 22095759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new permutation-based method for assessing agreement between two observers making replicated binary readings.
    Pan Y; Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):839-53. PubMed ID: 21432878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Simple Approach for Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Two Concordance Correlation Coefficients Estimated on the Same Subjects.
    Lin HM; Williamson JM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1145-60. PubMed ID: 25321842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concordance correlation coefficients estimated by generalized estimating equations and variance components for longitudinal repeated measurements.
    Tsai MY
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1319-1333. PubMed ID: 28105775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resampling dependent concordance correlation coefficients.
    Williamson JM; Crawford SB; Lin HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 17613648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concordance correlation in the measurements of time to event.
    Liu X; Du Y; Teresi J; Hasin DS
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1409-20. PubMed ID: 15568183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparison of clinical imaging devices with respect to parallel readings in both devices.
    Krummenauer F
    Eur J Med Res; 2006 Mar; 11(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 16751112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A general approach to evaluating agreement between two observers or methods of measurement from quantitative data with replicated measurements.
    Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 17698934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing observer agreement in studies involving replicated binary observations.
    Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):757-66. PubMed ID: 17613652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling concordance correlation via GEE to evaluate reproducibility.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):931-40. PubMed ID: 11550947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing intra- and inter-method agreement of functional data.
    Yue Y; Jang JH; Manatunga AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Jan; 33(1):112-129. PubMed ID: 38155544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.