117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15570805)
1. Autobanking of femoral heads for revision total hip replacement, a preliminary report of a new surgical technique.
Hing CB; Ball RY; Tucker JK
Surgeon; 2004 Feb; 2(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 15570805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost analysis of fresh-frozen femoral head allografts: is it worthwhile to run a bone bank?
Benninger E; Zingg PO; Kamath AF; Dora C
Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1307-11. PubMed ID: 25274913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total hip arthroplasty with cementless cups and femoral head autografts for patients with hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis.
Wu LD; Jin LB; Yan SG; Yang QS; Dai XS; Wang XH
Chin J Traumatol; 2004 Oct; 7(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 15363221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autogenous bone banking in a contralateral total hip arthroplasty. A case report.
Oishi CS; Grady-Benson JC; Colwell CW
J Arthroplasty; 1995 Feb; 10(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 7730820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Autobanking of femoral heads for revision total hip replacement, a preliminary report of a new surgical technique. Surg JR Coll Surg Edinb Irel. 2004: 2; 37-41.
Wroblewski BM
Surgeon; 2004 Oct; 2(5):295; author reply 296. PubMed ID: 15570852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Femoral head autograft in simultaneous primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
Ries MD; Wiedel JD
J Arthroplasty; 1995 Feb; 10(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 7730819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supercharging allografts with mesenchymal stem cells in the operating room during hip revision.
Homma Y; Kaneko K; Hernigou P
Int Orthop; 2014 Oct; 38(10):2033-44. PubMed ID: 24323352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?
Cafri G; Paxton EW; Love R; Bini SA; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using an autograft of the femoral head for marked acetabular dysplasia: case series.
Yamaguchi T; Naito M; Asayama I; Shiramizu K
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Jun; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 15237116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision of total hip arthroplasty using an anterior cortical window, extensive strut allografts, and an impaction graft: follow-up study.
Arif M; Sivananthan S; Choon DS
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Jun; 12(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15237118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement : a randomized trial.
Laupacis A; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Feeny D; Tugwell P; Wong C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Oct; 84(10):1823-8. PubMed ID: 12377914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement.
Drampalos E; Fadulelmola A; Mohammed R; Shaw D; Subramanian S; Jain KD; Hodgkinson J
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 Mar; 99(3):203-206. PubMed ID: 27791415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study.
Okuzu Y; Goto K; So K; Kuroda Y; Matsuda S
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Nov; 21(6):810-814. PubMed ID: 27553266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty. A brief note.
Della Valle CJ; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Paprosky WG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2385-90. PubMed ID: 14668509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost comparison of femoral head banking versus bone substitutes.
Leung HB; Fok MW; Chow LC; Yen CH
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Apr; 18(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 20427834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Beaulé PE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):108-16. PubMed ID: 15577474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
