These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15571438)

  • 41. fMRI delineation of working memory for emotional prosody in the brain: commonalities with the lexico-semantic emotion network.
    Mitchell RL
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(3):1015-25. PubMed ID: 17481919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Don't be afraid of irrelevant words: the emotional Stroop effect is confined to attended words.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(6):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22404379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study.
    Kuchinke L; Jacobs AM; Grubich C; Võ ML; Conrad M; Herrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2005 Dec; 28(4):1022-32. PubMed ID: 16084739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Complexity and hemispheric abilities: evidence for a differential impact on semantics and phonology.
    Tremblay T; Monetta L; Joanette Y
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 19070358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluative priming from subliminal emotional words: insights from event-related potentials and individual differences related to anxiety.
    Gibbons H
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):383-400. PubMed ID: 19328727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Adults' versus children's performance on the Stroop task: interference and facilitation.
    Wright BC; Wanley A
    Br J Psychol; 2003 Nov; 94(Pt 4):475-85. PubMed ID: 14687456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Task dependence in color-naming latency among dieters.
    Huon GF; Brown LB
    Int J Eat Disord; 1996 May; 19(4):405-10. PubMed ID: 8859399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Atypical brain laterality in adults with ADHD during dichotic listening for emotional intonation and words.
    Hale TS; Zaidel E; McGough JJ; Phillips JM; McCracken JT
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):896-904. PubMed ID: 16216289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study.
    Kanske P; Kotz SA
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1148():138-48. PubMed ID: 17391654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Early frontal responses elicited by physical threat words in an emotional Stroop task: Modulation by anxiety sensitivity.
    Taake I; Jaspers-Fayer F; Liotti M
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr; 81(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19428968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Right hemisphere specialization for color detection.
    Sasaki H; Morimoto A; Nishio A; Matsuura S
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Aug; 64(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 17493729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The left fusiform area is affected by written frequency of words.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Adorni R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2292-9. PubMed ID: 18485421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components.
    McKenna FP; Sharma D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):382-92. PubMed ID: 14979812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Hemispheric differences in the time-course of semantic priming processes: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Bouaffre S; Faïta-Ainseba F
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Mar; 63(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 17207563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Infant holding biases and their relations to hemispheric specializations for perceiving facial emotions.
    Vauclair J; Donnot J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):564-71. PubMed ID: 15716146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Emotionally negative stimuli are resistant to repetition priming.
    Marchewka A; Nowicka A
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2007; 67(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 17474324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Parafoveal semantic processing of emotional visual scenes.
    Calvo MG; Lang PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 15982128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.