These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15573065)

  • 1. Monitoring cardiac surgical performance: a commentary.
    Treasure T; Gallivan S; Sherlaw-Johnson C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Dec; 128(6):823-5. PubMed ID: 15573065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring clinical performance: a commentary.
    Spiegelhalter DJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Dec; 128(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 15573064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control chart methods for monitoring cardiac surgical performance and their interpretation.
    Rogers CA; Reeves BC; Caputo M; Ganesh JS; Bonser RS; Angelini GD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Dec; 128(6):811-9. PubMed ID: 15573063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring surgical performance.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Dec; 128(6):807-10. PubMed ID: 15573062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review.
    Yap CH; Colson ME; Watters DA
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):583-6. PubMed ID: 17610698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should employers review mortality data?
    Andrew BL
    Bus Health; 1992 Jun; 10(7):76. PubMed ID: 10171022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive Aristotle score: implications for the Norwood procedure.
    Sinzobahamvya N; Photiadis J; Kumpikaite D; Fink C; Blaschczok HC; Brecher AM; Asfour B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 May; 81(5):1794-800. PubMed ID: 16631674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer tools to assist the monitoring of outcomes in surgery.
    Sherlaw-Johnson C; Gallivan S; Treasure T; Nashef SA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Nov; 26(5):1032-6. PubMed ID: 15519199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception and reporting of cardiac surgical performance.
    Klein AA; Nashef SA
    Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Sep; 12(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18805853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Congenital heart disease outcome analysis: methodology and rationale.
    Mavroudis C; Jacobs JP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Jan; 123(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11782749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical process control tools for monitoring clinical performance.
    Lim TO
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Feb; 15(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12630794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of surgery for congenital heart disease: shall we wait a generation or look for different statistics?
    Lacour-Gayet F; Jacobs JP; Clarke DR; Gaynor JW; Jacobs ML; Anderson RH; Elliott MJ; Maruszewski B; Vouhé P; Mavroudis C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jul; 130(1):234-5. PubMed ID: 15999079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control charts, Cusum techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare.
    Noyez L
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Sep; 9(3):494-9. PubMed ID: 19509097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MADCAP: a graphical method for assessing risk scoring systems.
    Gallivan S; Utley M; Pagano D; Treasure T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 29(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 16483790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
    Hall BL; Hirbe M; Waterman B; Boslaugh S; Dunagan WC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing mortality rates from dubious data--when to stop doing statistics and start doing mathematics.
    Gallivan S
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2005 Aug; 8(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 16134437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring binary outcomes using risk-adjusted charts: a comparative study.
    Gombay E; Hussein AA; Steiner SH
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(23):2815-26. PubMed ID: 21786279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A risk-adjusted Sets method for monitoring adverse medical outcomes.
    Grigg OA; Farewell VT
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1593-602. PubMed ID: 15122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invited commentary.
    Van Arsdell G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 May; 81(5):1800-1. PubMed ID: 16631675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The scandal in Bristol and its effect on the British health services].
    Haaverstad R; Hilton C; Hamilton L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Mar; 124(6):816-8. PubMed ID: 15039819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.