BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15573369)

  • 1. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
    Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma.
    Rioux-Leclercq N; Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Patard JJ
    Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):868-74. PubMed ID: 17262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of Fuhrman and modified Fuhrman grading systems for conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Bektas S; Bahadir B; Kandemir NO; Barut F; Gul AE; Ozdamar SO
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2009 Nov; 25(11):596-600. PubMed ID: 19858038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
    Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic role of the histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma after slide revision.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Galfano A; Novara G; Gobbo S; Brunelli M; Pea M; Zattoni F; Artibani W
    Eur Urol; 2006 Oct; 50(4):786-93; discussion 793-4. PubMed ID: 16697521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. pT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study of the association between MIB-1 proliferative activity and pathologic features and cancer specific survival.
    Cheville JC; Zincke H; Lohse CM; Sebo TJ; Riehle D; Weaver AL; Blute ML
    Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2180-4. PubMed ID: 12001115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proposal for revision of the TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Guillè F; Schips L; de la Taille A; Prayer Galetti T; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Novara G; Zigeuner R; Bratti E; Li G; Altieri V; Abbou CC; Zanolla L; Artibani W; Patard JJ
    Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2116-23. PubMed ID: 16208703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
    Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
    Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology.
    Zigeuner R; Hutterer G; Chromecki T; Imamovic A; Kampel-Kettner K; Rehak P; Langner C; Pummer K
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 19062157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
    Wagner B; Patard JJ; Méjean A; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; Zigeuner R; Ficarra V; Tostain J; Mulders P; Chautard D; Descotes JL; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Prayer-Galetti T; Cindolo L; Valéri A; Meyer N; Jacqmin D; Lang H
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 18692951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
    Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
    Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma.
    Soda T; Fujikawa K; Ito T; Sasaki M; Nishio Y; Miyakawa M
    Lab Invest; 1999 Jul; 79(7):859-67. PubMed ID: 10418826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognosticfactors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: is TNM (1997) staging relevant in Indian subpopulation?
    Srivastava A; Mandhani A; Kapoor R; Jain M; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Raghavendra M; Kumar A
    Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(3):99-103. PubMed ID: 15472406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.