These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15573369)

  • 1. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
    Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma.
    Rioux-Leclercq N; Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Patard JJ
    Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):868-74. PubMed ID: 17262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of Fuhrman and modified Fuhrman grading systems for conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Bektas S; Bahadir B; Kandemir NO; Barut F; Gul AE; Ozdamar SO
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2009 Nov; 25(11):596-600. PubMed ID: 19858038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
    Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic role of the histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma after slide revision.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Galfano A; Novara G; Gobbo S; Brunelli M; Pea M; Zattoni F; Artibani W
    Eur Urol; 2006 Oct; 50(4):786-93; discussion 793-4. PubMed ID: 16697521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. pT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study of the association between MIB-1 proliferative activity and pathologic features and cancer specific survival.
    Cheville JC; Zincke H; Lohse CM; Sebo TJ; Riehle D; Weaver AL; Blute ML
    Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2180-4. PubMed ID: 12001115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proposal for revision of the TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Guillè F; Schips L; de la Taille A; Prayer Galetti T; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Novara G; Zigeuner R; Bratti E; Li G; Altieri V; Abbou CC; Zanolla L; Artibani W; Patard JJ
    Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2116-23. PubMed ID: 16208703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
    Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
    Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology.
    Zigeuner R; Hutterer G; Chromecki T; Imamovic A; Kampel-Kettner K; Rehak P; Langner C; Pummer K
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 19062157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
    Wagner B; Patard JJ; Méjean A; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; Zigeuner R; Ficarra V; Tostain J; Mulders P; Chautard D; Descotes JL; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Prayer-Galetti T; Cindolo L; Valéri A; Meyer N; Jacqmin D; Lang H
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 18692951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
    Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
    Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma.
    Soda T; Fujikawa K; Ito T; Sasaki M; Nishio Y; Miyakawa M
    Lab Invest; 1999 Jul; 79(7):859-67. PubMed ID: 10418826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognosticfactors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: is TNM (1997) staging relevant in Indian subpopulation?
    Srivastava A; Mandhani A; Kapoor R; Jain M; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Raghavendra M; Kumar A
    Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(3):99-103. PubMed ID: 15472406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.