479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15573433)
1. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection.
Childress JF
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Reflections on a Presidential Commission.
Faden R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):5-10. PubMed ID: 8891702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US radiation report prompts bioethics move.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6548):374. PubMed ID: 7566104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New Presidential National Bioethics Advisory Commission proposed.
Crigger BJ
IRB; 1994; 16(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11652792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is national, independent oversight needed for the protection of human subjects?
Capron AM
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):283-92. PubMed ID: 11658183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research.
Mastroianni AC
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):303-9. PubMed ID: 11658185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. Bioethics Commission meets, outlines agenda.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Nov; 14(11):1533. PubMed ID: 11644890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(117):28003-18. PubMed ID: 10112214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. US radiation report fails to satisfy critics.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6549):470. PubMed ID: 7566133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. IRBs and research with human biological materials.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 11657556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US bioethics panel poised to judge local review boards.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1996 Oct; 383(6600):466. PubMed ID: 8849708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The National Ethics Commission disbands.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Dec; 16(12):5. PubMed ID: 11933959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do we need another advisory commission on human experimentation?
Katz J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 7730048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A new bioethics commission.
Crigger BJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(6):2-3. PubMed ID: 11644641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
