These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15573494)

  • 1. On the distinction between Norwegian [symbols: see text] from a phonetic perspective.
    Simonsen HG; Moen I
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2004; 18(6-8):605-20. PubMed ID: 15573494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adult speakers' tongue-palate contact patterns for bilabial stops within complex clusters.
    Zharkova N; Schaeffler S; Gibbon FE
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Dec; 23(12):901-10. PubMed ID: 20001306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Articulatory and acoustic adaptation to palatal perturbation.
    Thibeault M; Ménard L; Baum SR; Richard G; McFarland DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2112-20. PubMed ID: 21476667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Co-articulatory variability and articulatory-acoustic correlations for consonants.
    Recasens D; Pallarès MD; Fontdevila J
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1995; 30(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 7492851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior.
    Brunner J; Fuchs S; Perrier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3936-49. PubMed ID: 19507976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech production in Parkinson's disease: I. An electropalatographic investigation of tongue-palate contact patterns.
    McAuliffe MJ; Ward EC; Murdoch BE
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 16393795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Palatal morphology can influence speaker-specific realizations of phonemic contrasts.
    Weirich M; Fuchs S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):S1894-908. PubMed ID: 24687445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability in fricative production and spectra: implications for the hyper- and hypo- and quantal theories of speech production.
    Tabain M
    Lang Speech; 2001 Mar; 44(Pt 1):57-94. PubMed ID: 11430188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electropalatography in the treatment of articulation/phonological disorders.
    Dagenais PA
    J Commun Disord; 1995 Dec; 28(4):303-29. PubMed ID: 8576412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives.
    Ali AM; Van der Spiegel J; Mueller P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2217-35. PubMed ID: 11386573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Darkness in [l] as a scalar phonetic property: implications for phonology and articulatory control.
    Recasens D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2004; 18(6-8):593-603. PubMed ID: 15573493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative investigation of coarticulation in fricatives: electropalatographic, electromagnetic, and acoustic data.
    Hoole P; Nguyen-Trong N; Hardcastle W
    Lang Speech; 1993; 36 ( Pt 2-3)():235-60. PubMed ID: 8277810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of speech rate manipulations on articulatory dynamics in severe traumatic brain injury: an EMA and EPG study.
    Murdoch BE; Kuruvilla MS; Goozée JV
    Brain Inj; 2012; 26(3):241-60. PubMed ID: 22372412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phonetic description of alveolar phones using electropalatography.
    Jesus Mde S; Reis C
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2012; 24(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23128174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Articulatory-to-acoustic relations in response to speaking rate and loudness manipulations.
    Mefferd AS; Green JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1206-19. PubMed ID: 20699341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tongue-palate contact pressure, oral air pressure, and acoustics of clear speech.
    Searl J; Evitts PM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):826-39. PubMed ID: 23275402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tongue-palate contact during bilabials in normal speech.
    Gibbon FE; Lee A; Yuen I
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Jan; 44(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 17214529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of a standard electropalatography artificial palate upon articulation. A preliminary study.
    McAuliffe MJ; Lin E; Robb MP; Murdoch BE
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 18065861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Palatal complexity revisited: an electropalatographic analysis of /see text for symbol/ in Brazilian Portuguese with comparison to Peninsular Spanish.
    Shosted R; Hualde JI; Scarpace D
    Lang Speech; 2012 Dec; 55(Pt 4):477-502. PubMed ID: 23420979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tongue palate contact patterns of velar stops in normal adult English speakers.
    Liker M; Gibbon FE
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Feb; 22(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 18253872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.