114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15573612)
1. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for air toxic emission inventories with censored emission factor data.
Frey HC; Zhao Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov; 38(22):6094-100. PubMed ID: 15573612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of probabilistic emission inventories of air toxics for Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Nov; 54(11):1405-21. PubMed ID: 15587554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of variability and uncertainty in air pollutant emission inventories: method and case study for utility NOx emissions.
Frey HC; Zheng J
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Sep; 52(9):1083-95. PubMed ID: 12269669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods for quantifying variability and uncertainty in AP-42 emission factors: case studies for natural gas-fueled engines.
Frey HC; Li S
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Dec; 53(12):1436-47. PubMed ID: 14700131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of variability and uncertainty in lawn and garden equipment NOx and total hydrocarbon emission factors.
Frey HC; Bammi S
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Apr; 52(4):435-48. PubMed ID: 12002189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probabilistic analysis of during cycle-based highway vehicle emission factors.
Frey HC; Zheng J
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Dec; 36(23):5184-91. PubMed ID: 12523436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.
Romano D; Bernetti A; De Lauretis R
Environ Int; 2004 Oct; 30(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15337355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of NO(x) fluxes measured by eddy covariance to emission inventories and land use.
Marr LC; Moore TO; Klapmeyer ME; Killar MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(4):1800-8. PubMed ID: 23316911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity analysis of ground-level ozone concentration to emission changes in two urban regions of southeast Texas.
Lin CJ; Ho TC; Chu HW; Yang H; Chandru S; Krishnarajanagar N; Chiou P; Hopper JR
J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 15854725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of variability and uncertainty using mixture distributions: evaluation of sample size, mixing weights, and separation between components.
Zheng J; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 15209930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.
Lioy PJ; Fan Z; Zhang J; Georgopoulos P; Wang SW; Ohman-Strickland P; Wu X; Zhu X; Harrington J; Tang X; Meng Q; Jung KH; Kwon J; Hernandez M; Bonnano L; Held J; Neal J;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Aug; (160):3-127; discussion 129-51. PubMed ID: 22097188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Review and analysis of global agricultural N₂O emissions relevant to the UK.
Buckingham S; Anthony S; Bellamy PH; Cardenas LM; Higgins S; McGeough K; Topp CF
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 487():164-72. PubMed ID: 24784741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of statistical methods for left-censored environmental data with nonuniform detection limits.
Sinha P; Lambert MB; Trumbull VL
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2006 Sep; 25(9):2533-40. PubMed ID: 16986810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing multipollutant emissions-based mobile source indicators to other single pollutant and multipollutant indicators in different urban areas.
Oakes MM; Baxter LK; Duvall RM; Madden M; Xie M; Hannigan MP; Peel JL; Pachon JE; Balachandran S; Russell A; Long TC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Nov; 11(11):11727-52. PubMed ID: 25405595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatiotemporal analysis of traffic emissions in over 5000 municipal districts in Brazil.
Réquia WJ; Koutrakis P; Roig HL; Adams MD
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Dec; 66(12):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 27623986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
