180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15573662)
1. Maxillo- mandibular relationship--a cephalometric study.
Kapoor DN; Chandana A; Tandon S
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Sep; 22(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 15573662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. F-H to AB plane angle (FABA) for assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
Yang SD; Suhr CH
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):223-31; discussion 232. PubMed ID: 7639436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.
Shildkraut M; Wood DP; Hunter WS
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7794320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cranial base, sagittal jaw relationship and occlusion. A radiological-craniometric appraisal.
Varjanne I; Koski K
Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1982; 78(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 7156124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Molar bite force in relation to occlusion, craniofacial dimensions, and head posture in pre-orthodontic children.
Sonnesen L; Bakke M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 15743864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
Del Santo M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The "3-D occlusogram" software.
Fiorelli G; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 10474112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The AS/BS occlusal angle, a replacement for the ANB angle].
Demisch A; Hügli R
SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1977 Nov; 87(11):1155-69. PubMed ID: 271358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes in growing class II malocclusion patients during nonextraction orthodontic treatment.
Combrink FJ; Harris AM; Steyn CL; Hudson AP
SADJ; 2006 Sep; 61(8):344-50. PubMed ID: 17165248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can 'articulare' be used in the cephalometric analysis of mandibular length? A methodologic study.
Stickel A; Pancherz H
Eur J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 10(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 3208849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Follow-up of position constants of the terminal hinge axis in Class II/1-cases after functional orthodontic treatment].
Köklü SO; Wegmann U
Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1986; 18(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 3471723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
Cordray FE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancies between centric occlusion and centric relation in orthodontically treated patients.
Gaither EL; Sadowsky PL; Vlachos CC; Wallace DD
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 9456615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
