These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15573944)
21. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography. Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital image compression should be limited in diabetic retinopathy screening. Basu A J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12(4):163-5. PubMed ID: 16774695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis. Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of 1-field, 2-fields, and 3-fields fundus photography for detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy. Lee JC; Nguyen L; Hynan LS; Blomquist PH J Diabetes Complications; 2019 Dec; 33(12):107441. PubMed ID: 31668742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparison between red-free digital images and colour transparencies. von Wendt G; Summanen P; Hallnäs K; Algvere P; Heikkilä K; Seregard S Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 243(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 15729542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison between one- and two-field 60 degree fundus photography when screening for diabetic retinopathy. von Wendt G; Rönnholm P; Heikkilä K; Summanen P Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Feb; 78(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 10726781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film. Tennant MT; Greve MD; Rudnisky CJ; Hillson TR; Hinz BJ Can J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 36(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 11428527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of film and digital fundus photographs in eyes of individuals with diabetes mellitus. Gangaputra S; Almukhtar T; Glassman AR; Aiello LP; Bressler N; Bressler SB; Danis RP; Davis MD; Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(9):6168-73. PubMed ID: 21571677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. George LD; Halliwell M; Hill R; Aldington SJ; Lusty J; Dunstan F; Owens DR Diabet Med; 1998 Mar; 15(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 9545127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. One-field, two-field and five-field handheld retinal imaging compared with standard seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography for diabetic retinopathy screening. Salongcay RP; Jacoba CMP; Salva CMG; Rageh A; Aquino LAC; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Ashraf M; Peto T; Silva PS Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 37094836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K; Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in South Africa with 60 degrees retinal colour photography. Joannou J; Kalk WJ; Mahomed I; Ntsepo S; Berzin M; Joffe BI; Raal FJ; Sachs E; van der Merwe MT; Wing JR J Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 239(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 8551199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia. Islam FMA PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy. Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography. Nghiem AZ; Nderitu P; Lukic M; Khatun M; Largan R; Kortuem K; Balaskas K; Sim D Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system. Fransen SR; Leonard-Martin TC; Feuer WJ; Hildebrand PL; Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 11874767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy in the James Bay Cree. Maberley D; Cruess AF; Barile G; Slakter J Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 9(3):169-78. PubMed ID: 12045884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes. Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]