These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15574088)

  • 1. Effects of standing vs. seated posture on repeated Wingate performance.
    McLester JR; Green JM; Chouinard JL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Nov; 18(4):816-20. PubMed ID: 15574088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standing and seated Wingate protocols in human cycling. A comparison of standard parameters.
    Reiser RF; Maines JM; Eisenmann JC; Wilkinson JG
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Nov; 88(1-2):152-7. PubMed ID: 12436284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of seated and standing triple Wingate tests.
    Wilson RW; Snyder AC; Dorman JC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 May; 23(3):868-73. PubMed ID: 19387391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the velotron racermate cycle ergometer to measure anaerobic power.
    Astorino TA; Cottrell T
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 33(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 22187386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seated versus standing position for maximization of performance during intense uphill cycling.
    Hansen EA; Waldeland H
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jul; 26(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 18569564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Level ground and uphill cycling efficiency in seated and standing positions.
    Millet GP; Tronche C; Fuster N; Candau R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Oct; 34(10):1645-52. PubMed ID: 12370567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spontaneous change from seated to standing cycling position with increasing power is associated with a minimization of cost functions.
    Costes A; Turpin NA; Villeger D; Moretto P; Watier B
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Apr; 36(8):907-913. PubMed ID: 28671851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power output, cadence, and torque are similar between the forward standing and traditional sprint cycling positions.
    Merkes PFJ; Menaspà P; Abbiss CR
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2020 Jan; 30(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 31544261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postactivation potentiation effect of overloaded cycling on subsequent cycling Wingate performance.
    Doma K; Leicht AS; Schumann M; Nagata A; Senzaki K; Woods CE
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 Feb; 59(2):217-222. PubMed ID: 29308849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers.
    Thorp AA; Kingwell BA; Owen N; Dunstan DW
    Occup Environ Med; 2014 Nov; 71(11):765-71. PubMed ID: 25168375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of sprint interval training and body weight reduction on power to weight ratio in experienced cyclists.
    Lunn WR; Finn JA; Axtell RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jul; 23(4):1217-24. PubMed ID: 19568031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of trunk angle on power production in cycling.
    Too D
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1994 Dec; 65(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 7886279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower Wingate Test Power Outcomes From "All-Out" Pretest Pedaling Cadence Compared With Moderate Cadence.
    Lunn WR; Zenoni MA; Crandall IH; Dress AE; Berglund ML
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2367-73. PubMed ID: 26200017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aerobic and anaerobic power characteristics of competitive cyclists in the United States Cycling Federation.
    Tanaka H; Bassett DR; Swensen TC; Sampedro RM
    Int J Sports Med; 1993 Aug; 14(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 8407064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental optimization of pivot point height for swing-arm type rear suspensions in off-road bicycles.
    Karchin A; Hull ML
    J Biomech Eng; 2002 Feb; 124(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 11871595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute effects on cognitive performance following bouts of standing and light-intensity physical activity in a simulated workplace environment.
    Mullane SL; Buman MP; Zeigler ZS; Crespo NC; Gaesser GA
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 May; 20(5):489-493. PubMed ID: 27777038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development and reliability of a repeated anaerobic cycling test in female ice hockey players.
    Wilson K; Snydmiller G; Game A; Quinney A; Bell G
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):580-4. PubMed ID: 20072039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of cycling peak power as measured by a short-sprint test versus the Wingate anaerobic test.
    Coso JD; Mora-Rodríguez R
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2006 Jun; 31(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 16770343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Wingate and Bosco anaerobic tests.
    Sands WA; McNeal JR; Ochi MT; Urbanek TL; Jemni M; Stone MH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Nov; 18(4):810-5. PubMed ID: 15574087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Micklewright D; Alkhatib A; Beneke R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Apr; 96(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 16468058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.