BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15575032)

  • 1. Rate of breast cancer diagnoses among postmenopausal women with self-reported breast symptoms.
    Aiello EJ; Buist DS; White E; Seger D; Taplin SH
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 2004; 17(6):408-15. PubMed ID: 15575032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program.
    Larsen M; Lilleborge M; Vigeland E; Hofvind S
    Breast; 2020 Dec; 54():56-61. PubMed ID: 32927237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reported breast symptoms in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Ryerson AB; Miller J; Eheman CR
    Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):733-40. PubMed ID: 25754109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status.
    Kavanagh AM; Giles GG; Mitchell H; Cawson JN
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 11002452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer.
    Barlow WE; Lehman CD; Zheng Y; Ballard-Barbash R; Yankaskas BC; Cutter GR; Carney PA; Geller BM; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K; Weaver DL; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Aug; 94(15):1151-9. PubMed ID: 12165640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of the Gail model, body mass index and SNPs to predict breast cancer among women with abnormal (BI-RADS 4) mammograms.
    McCarthy AM; Keller B; Kontos D; Boghossian L; McGuire E; Bristol M; Chen J; Domchek S; Armstrong K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 25567532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in women with breast symptoms in the mammography screening programme: A matched cohort analysis.
    Singh D; Malila N; Pitkäniemi J; Anttila A
    Int J Cancer; 2019 Jun; 144(12):2928-2935. PubMed ID: 30511466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relevance of reported symptoms in a breast screening programme.
    Williams RS; Brook D; Monypenny IJ; Gower-Thomas K
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Aug; 57(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 12169283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
    Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.
    White A; Miller J; Royalty J; Ryerson AB; Benard V; Helsel W; Kammerer W
    Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 25809209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
    Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K;
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.
    Taif S; Tufail F; Alnuaimi AS
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e250-8. PubMed ID: 24673798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
    Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for breast cancer in women undergoing mammography.
    Reuter KL; Baker SP; Krolikowski FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 1729780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of symptoms and interval breast cancers in the mammography-screening programme: population-based matched cohort study.
    Singh D; Miettinen J; Duffy S; Malila N; Pitkäniemi J; Anttila A
    Br J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 119(11):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 30401890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.