BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15577290)

  • 1. Variation in screening mammography and Papanicolaou smear by primary care physician specialty and gatekeeper plan (United States).
    Haggstrom DA; Phillips KA; Liang SY; Haas JS; Tye S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Causes Control; 2004 Nov; 15(9):883-92. PubMed ID: 15577290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter?
    Lurie N; Slater J; McGovern P; Ekstrum J; Quam L; Margolis K
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Aug; 329(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8332153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
    Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
    Martinez-Huedo MA; Lopez de Andres A; Hernandez-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Martinez Hernandez D; Jiménez-Garcia R
    Diabetes Metab; 2012 Apr; 38(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 22078638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specialty differences in primary care physician reports of papanicolaou test screening practices: a national survey, 2006 to 2007.
    Yabroff KR; Saraiya M; Meissner HI; Haggstrom DA; Wideroff L; Yuan G; Berkowitz Z; Davis WW; Benard VB; Coughlin SS
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(9):602-11. PubMed ID: 19884621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physician recommendation for papanicolaou testing among U.S. women, 2000.
    Coughlin SS; Breslau ES; Thompson T; Benard VB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 15894664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ambulatory care visits for Pap tests, abnormal Pap test results, and cervical cancer procedures in the United States.
    Saraiya M; McCaig LF; Ekwueme DU
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Jun; 16(6):e137-44. PubMed ID: 20536271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
    Suarez L; Pulley L
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts.
    Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary care physicians' awareness and adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines in Texas.
    Holland-Barkis P; Forjuoh SN; Couchman GR; Capen C; Rascoe TG; Reis MD
    Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 42(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 16290022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Too much of a good thing? Physician practices and patient willingness for less frequent pap test screening intervals.
    Meissner HI; Tiro JA; Yabroff KR; Haggstrom DA; Coughlin SS
    Med Care; 2010 Mar; 48(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 20182268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Managed health plan effects on the specialty referral process: results from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network referral study.
    Forrest CB; Nutting P; Werner JJ; Starfield B; von Schrader S; Rohde C
    Med Care; 2003 Feb; 41(2):242-53. PubMed ID: 12555052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004.
    Bhosle M; Samuel S; Vosuri V; Paskett E; Balkrishnan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 103(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17028978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence.
    May DS; Kiefe CI; Funkhouser E; Fouad MN
    Prev Med; 1999 Apr; 28(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 10090868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
    Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC
    Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.
    Somkin CP; Hiatt RA; Hurley LB; Gruskin E; Ackerson L; Larson P
    Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1658-64. PubMed ID: 9250226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's primary care providers and breast cancer screening: who's following the guidelines?
    Wallace AE; MacKenzie TA; Weeks WB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):744-8. PubMed ID: 16522407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
    dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in abnormal cancer screening results in the United States of America.
    Yabroff KR; Freedman A; Brown ML; Ballard-Barbash R; McNeel T; Taplin S
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 17626704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.