These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15577473)

  • 1. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.
    Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Humphrey SM; Blanchard CR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):102-7. PubMed ID: 15577473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
    Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
    Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three-dimensional parameterized and visually kinematic simulation module for the theoretical range of motion of total hip arthroplasty.
    Ji WT; Tao K; Wang CT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jun; 25(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 20189695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acetabular alignment and primary arc of motion for minus, skirtless, and skirted 28-, 32-, 36-, and 40-mm femoral heads.
    Kosashvili Y; Omoto D; Backstein D; Safir O; Lakstein D; Gross AE
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):279-285.e2. PubMed ID: 22854347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion.
    Gondi G; Roberson JR; Ganey TM; Shahriari A; Hutton WC
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 9434247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Jingushi S; Yamamoto T; Kuraoka A; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthopaedic crossfire--Larger femoral heads: a triumph of hope over reason! In opposition.
    Maloney WJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):85-7. PubMed ID: 12730936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between dislocation, impingement, and articular geometry in retrieved acetabular polyethylene cups.
    Tanino H; Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1401-7. PubMed ID: 17471491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of elevated-rim acetabular liner and 32-mm femoral head on stability in total hip arthroplasty.
    Qassem DM; Smith KB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1):88-90. PubMed ID: 14758388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.
    Kessler O; Patil S; Wirth S; Mayr E; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
    Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
    Shimmin AJ; Walter WL; Esposito C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 20357319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint.
    Bartz RL; Nobel PC; Kadakia NR; Tullos HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1300-7. PubMed ID: 11005521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Computer-based motion simulation of total hip prostheses with ceramic-on-ceramic wear couple. Analysis of implant design andorientation as influence parameters].
    Bader R; Steinhauser E; Gradinger R; Willmann G; Mittelmeier W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 12085297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
    D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.