214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15577878)
1. Journals must cooperate to defend biosecurity.
Rath J; Jank B; Doblhoff-Dier O
Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7017):549. PubMed ID: 15577878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Journals tighten up on biosecurity.
Check E
Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):774. PubMed ID: 12594467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risks and benefits of dual-use research.
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7044):855. PubMed ID: 15959472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Statement on the consideration of biodefence and biosecurity.
Atlas R; Campbell P; Cozzarelli NR; Curfman G; Enquist L; Fink G; Flanagin A; Fletcher J; George E; Hammes G; Heyman D; Inglesby T; Kaplan S; Kennedy D; Krug J; Levinson R; Marcus E; Metzger H; Morse SS; O'Brien A; Onderdonk A; Poste G; Renault B; Rich R; Rosengard A; Salzberg S; Scanlan M; Shenk T; Tabor H; Varmus H; Wimmer E; Yamamoto K;
Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):771. PubMed ID: 12594463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Better never than late.
Kennedy D
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5746):195. PubMed ID: 16223986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New EU regulations: towards biosecurity but not censorship.
Roller C; Elbing K
Eur J Immunol; 2007 Dec; 37(12):3301-3. PubMed ID: 18050161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards better biosecurity.
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):715. PubMed ID: 16598212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA committee is model for bioterrorism debate.
Perpich JG
Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6915):462. PubMed ID: 12466817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Science and security. Researchers urged to self-censor sensitive data.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5605):321. PubMed ID: 12531982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science publishing and security concerns.
Falkow S
Science; 2003 May; 300(5620):737-9; author reply 737-9. PubMed ID: 12730579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Publishing risky research.
Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):5. PubMed ID: 22552050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Issues in biosecurity and biosafety.
Cook-Deegan RM; Berkelman R; Davidson EM; Finder S; Heitman E; Kelley MC; King NM; Moseley R; Thomas JC; Tilden SJ; Vangsnes NM
Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5730):1867-8. PubMed ID: 15976287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Do not censor science in the name of biosecurity.
Trevan T
Nature; 2012 Jun; 486(7403):295. PubMed ID: 22722152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Statement on scientific publication and security" fails to provide necessary guidelines.
Falkow S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 May; 100(10):5575. PubMed ID: 12743359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioterrorism. A call for restraint on biological data.
Couzin J
Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5582):749-51. PubMed ID: 12161619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bush domestic security proposal affects range of biotech programs.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):643. PubMed ID: 12089536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biodefense. Proposed biosecurity review plan endorses self-regulation.
Kaiser J
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5824):529. PubMed ID: 17463258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 1918 flu and responsible science.
Sharp PA
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):17. PubMed ID: 16210500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Biological research and security institutes].
Darsie G; Falczuk AJ; Bergmann IE
Rev Sci Tech; 2006 Apr; 25(1):321-7. PubMed ID: 16796057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
