125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15578412)
1. Phenotypic differences between commercial Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and L. rhamnosus strains recovered from blood.
Ouwehand AC; Saxelin M; Salminen S
Clin Infect Dis; 2004 Dec; 39(12):1858-60. PubMed ID: 15578412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lactobacillus bacteremia during a rapid increase in probiotic use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in Finland.
Salminen MK; Tynkkynen S; Rautelin H; Saxelin M; Vaara M; Ruutu P; Sarna S; Valtonen V; Järvinen A
Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Nov; 35(10):1155-60. PubMed ID: 12410474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lactobacillus bacteremia, clinical significance, and patient outcome, with special focus on probiotic L. rhamnosus GG.
Salminen MK; Rautelin H; Tynkkynen S; Poussa T; Saxelin M; Valtonen V; Järvinen A
Clin Infect Dis; 2004 Jan; 38(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 14679449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bile salt and acid tolerance of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from Parmigiano Reggiano cheese.
Succi M; Tremonte P; Reale A; Sorrentino E; Grazia L; Pacifico S; Coppola R
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 Mar; 244(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 15727832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety assessment of Lactobacillus strains: presence of putative risk factors in faecal, blood and probiotic isolates.
Vesterlund S; Vankerckhoven V; Saxelin M; Goossens H; Salminen S; Ouwehand AC
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 116(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 17391794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of cell surface properties and adhesion potential of selected probiotic strains.
Xu H; Jeong HS; Lee HY; Ahn J
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Oct; 49(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 19725886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liver abscess due to a Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain indistinguishable from L. rhamnosus strain GG.
Rautio M; Jousimies-Somer H; Kauma H; Pietarinen I; Saxelin M; Tynkkynen S; Koskela M
Clin Infect Dis; 1999 May; 28(5):1159-60. PubMed ID: 10452653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lactobacillus sepsis associated with probiotic therapy.
Land MH; Rouster-Stevens K; Woods CR; Cannon ML; Cnota J; Shetty AK
Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):178-81. PubMed ID: 15629999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Use of molecular methods in food microbiology with the example of probiotic use of lactobacilli].
Klein G
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003; 116(11-12):510-6. PubMed ID: 14655631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase gene (fbp) sequences for the identification of Lactobacillus rhamnosus.
Roy D; Ward P
Curr Microbiol; 2004 Nov; 49(5):313-20. PubMed ID: 15486704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sugar fermentation in probiotic bacteria--an in vitro study.
Hedberg M; Hasslöf P; Sjöström I; Twetman S; Stecksén-Blicks C
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2008 Dec; 23(6):482-5. PubMed ID: 18954354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of new probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains.
Zhou JS; Pillidge CJ; Gopal PK; Gill HS
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 98(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 15681048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of Molecular Methods to Determine Whether a Probiotic is the Source of Lactobacillus Bacteremia.
Aroutcheva A; Auclair J; Frappier M; Millette M; Lolans K; de Montigny D; Carrière S; Sokalski S; Trick WE; Weinstein RA
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2016 Mar; 8(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 26915093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of genotypic and phenotypic analyses to commercial probiotic strain identity and relatedness.
Yeung PS; Kitts CL; Cano R; Tong PS; Sanders ME
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(5):1095-104. PubMed ID: 15479427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of probiotic bacterial strains used in medicinal products].
Wiatrzyk A; Polak M; Czajka U; Krysztopa-Grzybowska K; Lutyńska A
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2013; 65(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 24180131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lactobacillus bacteremia, species identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility of 85 blood isolates.
Salminen MK; Rautelin H; Tynkkynen S; Poussa T; Saxelin M; Valtonen V; Järvinen A
Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 42(5):e35-44. PubMed ID: 16447101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid identification of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in probiotic products using multiplex PCR.
Sul SY; Kim HJ; Kim TW; Kim HY
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 17(3):490-5. PubMed ID: 18050954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of probiotic lactobacilli used for animal feeds on the basis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence.
Higuchi W; Muramatsu M; Dohmae S; Takano T; Isobe H; Yabe S; Da S; Baranovich T; Yamamoto T
Microbiol Immunol; 2008 Nov; 52(11):559-63. PubMed ID: 19090836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from stool samples of longevous people in regions of Hotan, Xinjiang and Bama, Guangxi, China.
Gu RX; Yang ZQ; Li ZH; Chen SL; Luo ZL
Anaerobe; 2008 Dec; 14(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 18634896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Representational difference analysis and real-time PCR for strain-specific quantification of Lactobacillus sobrius sp. nov.
Konstantinov SR; Smidt H; de Vos WM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 71(11):7578-81. PubMed ID: 16269808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
