510 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15580245)
21. The basics of human subjects protection.
Yoder LH
Medsurg Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(2):95-8; quiz 99. PubMed ID: 16700248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?
Wegman DH; Major E
Am J Ind Med; 2009 Feb; 52(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 19016264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.
Atici E; Erdemir AD
J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 18375684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality?
Ashcroft RE
New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 15706668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Sino-European research ethics on the right path.
Rehmann-Sutter C
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7302):28. PubMed ID: 20595992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Financial conflicts of interest and protection of human research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15462034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A non-paternalistic model of research ethics and oversight: assessing the benefits of prospective review.
London AJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):930-44. PubMed ID: 23289696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Subject protection and the risk-benefit relationship.
Schonfeld TL; Brown JS; Gordon BG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 16179301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Viewpoint: developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research.
de Melo-Martín I; Palmer LI; Fins JJ
Acad Med; 2007 Sep; 82(9):900-4. PubMed ID: 17726404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ministerial action plan on research ethics and scientific integrity.
Deschamps P
NCEHR Commun; 1998-1999 Fall; 9(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 15468465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethics committees in the United States.
Capron AM
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review.
Israel M
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):525-6. PubMed ID: 23033478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Letter to the editor: Would you know an undue inducement if you saw one?
Schwab AP
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W17. PubMed ID: 16179291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Stranger at the consultation: increasing the diversity in research ethics consultation.
Jotkowitz A; Zivotofsky AZ
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Mar; 8(3):25-6; discussion W4-6. PubMed ID: 18570095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Challenges faced by research ethics committees in El Salvador: results from a focus group study.
Camp JW; Barfield RC; Rodriguez V; Young AJ; Finerman R; Caniza MA
Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 18302541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
Lynn MR; Nelson DK
Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nursing and ethics--biomedical research.
Bross W
Ala Nurse; 2004; 31(1):20. PubMed ID: 15095523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
