These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1558066)

  • 1. Cephalometric changes during treatment with the open bite bionator.
    Weinbach JR; Smith RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Apr; 101(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 1558066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal open-bite malocclusion with the open-bite bionator: a cephalometric study.
    Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):595-8. PubMed ID: 18005832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator appliance.
    Mamandras AH; Allen LP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 2301298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1.
    Bolmgren GA; Moshiri F
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 3461735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1.
    Carels C; Reychler A; van der Linden FP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 9426166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator.
    Lange DW; Kalra V; Broadbent BH; Powers M; Nelson S
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 8702068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance and vertical chin cap on dentofacial structures.
    Basciftci FA; Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 11843276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction.
    Hans MG; Kishiyama C; Parker SH; Wolf GR; Noachtar R
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):265-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 7978521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the bionator.
    Ahn SJ; Kim JT; Nahm DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 11395700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces.
    Nanda SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 2403077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype.
    Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial changes in children treated with the Activator appliance: a lateral cephalometric study.
    Mamandras AH; D'Aloisio DR; Lenizky RJ
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1989 Sep; 55(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 2676117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.