BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1558066)

  • 1. Cephalometric changes during treatment with the open bite bionator.
    Weinbach JR; Smith RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Apr; 101(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 1558066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal open-bite malocclusion with the open-bite bionator: a cephalometric study.
    Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):595-8. PubMed ID: 18005832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator appliance.
    Mamandras AH; Allen LP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 2301298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1.
    Bolmgren GA; Moshiri F
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 3461735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1.
    Carels C; Reychler A; van der Linden FP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 9426166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator.
    Lange DW; Kalra V; Broadbent BH; Powers M; Nelson S
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 8702068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance and vertical chin cap on dentofacial structures.
    Basciftci FA; Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 11843276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction.
    Hans MG; Kishiyama C; Parker SH; Wolf GR; Noachtar R
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):265-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 7978521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the bionator.
    Ahn SJ; Kim JT; Nahm DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 11395700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces.
    Nanda SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 2403077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype.
    Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial changes in children treated with the Activator appliance: a lateral cephalometric study.
    Mamandras AH; D'Aloisio DR; Lenizky RJ
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1989 Sep; 55(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 2676117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.