These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1558068)

  • 21. Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing.
    Chin MY; Sandham A; Rumachik EN; Ruben JL; Huysmans MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 19815157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new self-curing resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Fricker JP
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Mar; 14(4):247-9. PubMed ID: 9528409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets Part 1: Wetting with water.
    Cacciafesta V; Bosch C; Melsen B
    Clin Orthod Res; 1998 Aug; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9918643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage under ceramic and metallic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Ramoglu SI; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ertas H
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):138-43. PubMed ID: 19123712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical comparison between a glass ionomer cement and a composite for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Miguel JA; Almeida MA; Chevitarese O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 May; 107(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 7733057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bond strength of brackets cemented with light-cured glass-ionomer cements to contaminated enamel.
    Itoh T; Fukushima T; Inoue Y; Matsuo N; Matsumoto M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 11763927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sandblasted metal brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo.
    Ozer M; Arici S
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15898381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bonding and debonding with a light-activated resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    Fricker JP
    Aust Orthod J; 1996 Mar; 14(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 9063113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical evaluation of bonding with glass ionomer cement.
    Ravindranath VK; Kapoor DN; Sharma VP
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1993 Mar; 7(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 9791242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of fluoride application on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Calvi D; Scribante A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):580-3; quiz 626. PubMed ID: 15877038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metallic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements under different enamel conditions.
    Pithon MM; Dos Santos RL; de Oliveira MV; Ruellas AC; Romano FL
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):700-4. PubMed ID: 16808580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surface appearance following the use of glass ionomer cement and a diacrylate resin for bracket bonding.
    Ostman-Andersson E; Marcusson A; Hörstedt P
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 8236031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of different bracket base surfaces on tensile and shear bond strength.
    Algera TJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Feilzer AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 18684707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets.
    Gorton J; Featherstone JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12532056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets cemented to bovine enamel with composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Titley KC; Mahal RD; Rossouw PE; Kulkarni GV
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 12889704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of pumicing on the in vivo use of a resin modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement and a conventional no-mix composite for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    J Orthod; 2002 Sep; 29(3):217-20; discussion 196. PubMed ID: 12218200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.