These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15581121)

  • 1. Spatial S-R compatibility effects in an intentional imitation task.
    Heyes C; Ray E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Aug; 11(4):703-8. PubMed ID: 15581121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems.
    Leighton J; Heyes C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1174-83. PubMed ID: 20731510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are automatic imitation and spatial compatibility mediated by different processes?
    Cooper RP; Catmur C; Heyes C
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(4):605-30. PubMed ID: 22578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic imitation? Imitative compatibility affects responses at high perceptual load.
    Catmur C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 26569336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The imitation game: Effects of social cues on 'imitation' are domain-general in nature.
    Marsh LE; Bird G; Catmur C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():368-375. PubMed ID: 27369095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The brain's intention to imitate: the neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation.
    Bien N; Roebroeck A; Goebel R; Sack AT
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Oct; 19(10):2338-51. PubMed ID: 19153108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility.
    Catmur C; Heyes C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):409-21. PubMed ID: 20731523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imitation in one's own presence: No specific effect of self-focus on imitation.
    Khemka D; Ahmadilari N; Bird G; Catmur C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103194. PubMed ID: 33137613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task.
    Brass M; Bekkering H; Prinz W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2001 Jan; 106(1-2):3-22. PubMed ID: 11256338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is automatic imitation based on goal coding or movement coding? A comparison of goal-directed and goal-less actions.
    Chiavarino C; Bugiani S; Grandi E; Colle L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 23422654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatically controlled: Task irrelevance fully cancels otherwise automatic imitation.
    Hemed E; Mark-Tavger I; Hertz U; Bakbani-Elkayam S; Eitam B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):996-1017. PubMed ID: 34807711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synchronous imitation of continuous action sequences: The role of spatial and topological mapping.
    Ramenzoni VC; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1209-22. PubMed ID: 26052697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imitation components in the human brain: an fMRI study.
    Mengotti P; Corradi-Dell'acqua C; Rumiati RI
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1622-30. PubMed ID: 21933718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Goals' are not an integral component of imitation.
    Leighton J; Bird G; Heyes C
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 19945096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of action-effect associations acquired by ideomotor learning on imitation.
    Bunlon F; Marshall PJ; Quandt LC; Bouquet CA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121617. PubMed ID: 25793755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intact Automatic Imitation and Typical Spatial Compatibility in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Challenging the Broken Mirror Theory.
    Sowden S; Koehne S; Catmur C; Dziobek I; Bird G
    Autism Res; 2016 Feb; 9(2):292-300. PubMed ID: 26112060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.