These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15581191)
21. Spoken-word recognition: the access to embedded words. Isel F; Bacri N Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10433740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics. Stolz JA; Stevanovski B J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A neural signature of phonological access: distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming. Graves WW; Grabowski TJ; Mehta S; Gordon JK J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 19(4):617-31. PubMed ID: 17381253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development. Nation K; Cocksey J J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 19410262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inhibitory phonetic priming: Where does the effect come from? Dufour S; Frauenfelder UH Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):180-96. PubMed ID: 26041020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Gaskell MG; Marslen-Wilson WD Cogn Psychol; 2002 Sep; 45(2):220-66. PubMed ID: 12528902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood? Newman RS; Sawusch JR; Luce PA Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):941-60. PubMed ID: 16496717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of relatedness proportion on the joint relationship among word frequency, stimulus quality, and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Aschenbrenner AJ; Yap MJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2452-2461. PubMed ID: 30947626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Word semantics is processed even without attentional effort. Relander K; Rämä P; Kujala T J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1511-22. PubMed ID: 18823236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Semantic Richness Effects in Spoken Word Recognition: A Lexical Decision and Semantic Categorization Megastudy. Goh WD; Yap MJ; Lau MC; Ng MM; Tan LC Front Psychol; 2016; 7():976. PubMed ID: 27445936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How does the provision of semantic information influence the lexicalization of new spoken words? Hawkins EA; Rastle K Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1322-39. PubMed ID: 26241013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The interaction of meaning and sound in spoken word recognition. Tyler LK; Voice JK; Moss HE Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 10909140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Processing Lexical and Speaker Information in Repetition and Semantic/Associative Priming. Lee CY; Zhang Y J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Feb; 47(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 28752195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary? Borowsky R; Besner D Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. PubMed ID: 16478310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Phonological ambiguity and lexical ambiguity: effects on visual and auditory word recognition. Frost R; Feldman LB; Katz L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 2142953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]