These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85. Aesthetic taste versus utility: the emotional and rational of the individual. Mourthé C; Dejean PH Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1079-85. PubMed ID: 22316863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life. Weigand R; Jacobsen T PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248529. PubMed ID: 33711069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. The Aesthetic Preference for Nature Sounds Depends on Sound Object Recognition. Van Hedger SC; Nusbaum HC; Heald SLM; Huang A; Kotabe HP; Berman MG Cogn Sci; 2019 May; 43(5):e12734. PubMed ID: 31087588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Perception, memory and aesthetics of indeterminate art. Ishai A; Fairhall SL; Pepperell R Brain Res Bull; 2007 Jul; 73(4-6):319-24. PubMed ID: 17562398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study. Kirk U; Skov M; Christensen MS; Nygaard N Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):306-15. PubMed ID: 18783864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. The pleasantness of visual symmetry: always, never or sometimes. Pecchinenda A; Bertamini M; Makin AD; Ruta N PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92685. PubMed ID: 24658112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Self-generated cognitive fluency as an alternative route to preference formation. Constable MD; Bayliss AP; Tipper SP; Kritikos A Conscious Cogn; 2013 Mar; 22(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 23257122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Evaluating aesthetic experience through personal-appearance styles: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. Cheung MC; Law D; Yip J PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115112. PubMed ID: 25551635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Aesthetic principles, the arts, and the interpretation of culture. von Brück M Psych J; 2021 Apr; 10(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 33442963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Time judgment, aesthetic preference, and need for achievement. GREEN HB; KNAPP RH J Abnorm Psychol; 1959 Jan; 58(1):140-2. PubMed ID: 13620427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
96. The differential power of extraneous influences to modify aesthetic judgments of biological and artifactual stimuli. Bignardi G; Ishizu T; Zeki S Psych J; 2021 Apr; 10(2):190-199. PubMed ID: 33295099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Spectral brain signatures of aesthetic natural perception in the α and β frequency bands. Kaiser D J Neurophysiol; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1501-1505. PubMed ID: 36259673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Beauty at a glance: The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration. Brielmann AA; Vale L; Pelli DG J Vis; 2017 Dec; 17(14):9. PubMed ID: 29228142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Moving the eye of the beholder. Motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Topolinski S Psychol Sci; 2010 Sep; 21(9):1220-4. PubMed ID: 20639401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Heuristics of reasoning and analogy in children's visual perspective taking. Yaniv I; Shatz M Child Dev; 1990 Oct; 61(5):1491-501. PubMed ID: 2245740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]