These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15583044)

  • 1. Unexpected estimates of variance components with a true model containing genetic competition effects.
    Van Vleck LD; Cassady JP
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 15583044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of genetic parameters for average daily gain using models with competition effects.
    Chen CY; Kachman SD; Johnson RK; Newman S; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2525-30. PubMed ID: 18539840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 19933426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of competition on gain in feedlot bulls from Hereford selection lines.
    Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1625-33. PubMed ID: 17371791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation study on covariance component estimation for two binary traits in an underlying continuous scale.
    Mäntysaari EA; Quaas RL; Gröhn YT
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):580-91. PubMed ID: 2045564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On identifiability of (co)variance components in animal models with competition effects.
    Cantet RJ; Cappa EP
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):371-81. PubMed ID: 19134072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of population structure on estimates of direct and maternal parameters.
    Heydarpour M; Schaeffer LR; Yazdi MH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Apr; 125(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 18363974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of social interactions on empirical responses to selection for average daily gain of boars.
    Chen CY; Johnson RK; Newman S; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):844-9. PubMed ID: 18997079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of additive maternal and cytoplasmic genetic variances in animal models.
    Southwood OI; Kennedy BW; Meyer K; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 1989 Nov; 72(11):3006-12. PubMed ID: 2625491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci detection in livestock populations.
    Kolbehdari D; Jansen GB; Schaeffer LR; Allen BO
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun; 123(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16706924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fertility traits in spring-calving Aberdeen Angus cattle. 1. Model development and genetic parameters.
    Urioste JI; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):2854-60. PubMed ID: 17504968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of methods for computing approximate accuracies of predicted breeding values in maternal random regression models for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 18203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model comparison for genetic evaluation of milk yield in crossbred Holsteins in the tropics.
    Chanvijit K; Duangjinda M; Pattarajinda V; Reodecha C
    J Appl Genet; 2005; 46(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 16278512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gene-environment interactions in complex diseases: genetic models and methods for QTL mapping in multiple half-sib populations.
    Kadarmideen HN; Li Y; Janss LL
    Genet Res; 2006 Oct; 88(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 16978428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of additive genetic variance when selected base animals are considered fixed.
    van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1068-76. PubMed ID: 1582936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetics of litter size in three maternal lines of rabbits: repeatability versus multiple-trait models.
    Piles M; García ML; Rafel O; Ramon J; Baselga M
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2309-15. PubMed ID: 16908633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance, behavior, and welfare of Friesian heifers housed in pens with two, four, and eight individuals per concentrate feeding place.
    González LA; Ferret A; Manteca X; Ruíz-de-la-Torre JL; Calsamiglia S; Devant M; Bach A
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1446-58. PubMed ID: 18272856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three statistical approaches for genetic analysis of disease resistance to vibriosis in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.).
    Kettunen A; Serenius T; Fjalestad KT
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):305-13. PubMed ID: 17235017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling evolutionary processes in small populations: not as ideal as you think.
    Waples RS; Faulkner JR
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):1834-47. PubMed ID: 19344355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.