These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15583044)

  • 41. Fertility traits in spring-calving Aberdeen Angus cattle. 2. Model comparison.
    Urioste JI; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):2861-5. PubMed ID: 17686900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of twin pair permutation on likelihood-based-estimates of genetic variance that require ordering of twin-pairs.
    Byrne E; Stillitano M; Williams CJ; Christian JC
    Behav Genet; 2007 Jul; 37(4):617-20. PubMed ID: 17473978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Gruand J; Caritez JC; Billon Y; Guillouet P; Lagant H; Noblet J; Sellier P
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3182-8. PubMed ID: 17785600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Analysis of genetic effects of major genes and polygenes on quantitative traits I. Genetic model for diploid plants and animals.
    Lou XY; Zhu J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2002 Feb; 104(2-3):414-421. PubMed ID: 12582714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. REML estimation of variance parameters in nonlinear mixed effects models using the SAEM algorithm.
    Meza C; Jaffrézic F; Foulley JL
    Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):876-88. PubMed ID: 17638294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 17965329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate.
    Broberg P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 6():199. PubMed ID: 16086831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Maternal genetic effects set the potential for evolution in a free-living vertebrate population.
    Wilson AJ; Coltman DW; Pemberton JM; Overall AD; Byrne KA; Kruuk LE
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Mar; 18(2):405-14. PubMed ID: 15715846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Estimation of genetically effective breeding numbers using a rejection algorithm approach.
    Ramakrishnan U; Storz JF; Taylor BL; Lande R
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Nov; 13(11):3283-92. PubMed ID: 15487989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimation of variance components and prediction of breeding values based on group records from varying group sizes.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen B; Ostersen T; Shirali M; Jensen J; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Aug; 50(1):42. PubMed ID: 30107792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimation of variance components including competitive effects of Large White growing gilts.
    Arango J; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Culbertson M; Herring W
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 15890801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Full sib pens of pigs are not suitable to identify variance component of associative effect: a simulation study using Gibbs Sampling.
    Cheng J; Janssens S; Buys N
    BMC Genet; 2009 Feb; 10():9. PubMed ID: 19250536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A note on genetic variance components in mixed models.
    Hazelton ML; Gurrin LC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 May; 24(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 12687647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Multitrait animal model with genetic groups.
    Da Y; Grossman M
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Sep; 74(9):3183-95. PubMed ID: 1779067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of different pedigree structures on the sampling variance of heritability estimates.
    Reverter A; Kaiser CJ
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2355-61. PubMed ID: 9303453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Generating data in models including direct and maternal dominance effects.
    Duangjinda M; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Appl Genet; 2001; 42(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 14564052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimation of additive genetic variance when base populations are selected.
    van der Werf JH; de Boer IJ
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Oct; 68(10):3124-32. PubMed ID: 2254191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of genetic groups on estimates of additive genetic variance.
    Pieramati C; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jan; 71(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 8454554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Scrutiny of variance results for outliers: Cochran's test optimized.
    't Lam RU
    Anal Chim Acta; 2010 Feb; 659(1-2):68-84. PubMed ID: 20103107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Study on the calculation methods of confidence intervals of genetic parameter estimates by method R and number of repeating estimations].
    Liu WZ; Wang QD
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Jul; 31(7):695-700. PubMed ID: 15473321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.