These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15583355)

  • 1. Impact of clinical practice guidelines on the clinical microbiology laboratory when using automated blood culture systems for bacterial contamination screening of apheresis platelet products.
    Stutzman LC; Sullivan N
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Dec; 42(12):5963; author reply 5963-4. PubMed ID: 15583355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacterial contamination of platelets.
    Palavecino EL; Yomtovian RA; Jacobs MR
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2010 Feb; 42(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 19939734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-house validation of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.
    Dunne WM; Case LK; Isgriggs L; Lublin DM
    Transfusion; 2005 Jul; 45(7):1138-42. PubMed ID: 15987359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limiting and detecting bacterial contamination of apheresis platelets: inlet-line diversion and increased culture volume improve component safety.
    Eder AF; Kennedy JM; Dy BA; Notari EP; Skeate R; Bachowski G; Mair DC; Webb JS; Wagner SJ; Dodd RY; Benjamin RJ;
    Transfusion; 2009 Aug; 49(8):1554-63. PubMed ID: 19413735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Culture-based bacterial detection systems for platelets: the effect of time prior to sampling and duration of incubation required for detection with aerobic culture.
    Ezuki S; Kawabata K; Kanno T; Ohto H
    Transfusion; 2007 Nov; 47(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 17958533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blood surveillance and detection on platelet bacterial contamination associated with septic events.
    Hsueh JC; Ho CF; Chang SH; Pan FZ; Chen SC; Shi MD; Chien ST
    Transfus Med; 2009 Dec; 19(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 19719474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.
    Riedel S; Siwek G; Beekmann SE; Richter SS; Raife T; Doern GV
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 44(6):2262-4. PubMed ID: 16757635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imported platelets demonstrate decreased pH and glucose by reagent strip testing when compared to locally derived platelets.
    Clark P; Parsons TM; Boyd JC; Dewey P; Mintz PD
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2006; 36(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 17127732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bacterial contamination of platelet components: remaining risks after introduction of bacterial screening.
    Beckers EA
    Vox Sang; 2005 Aug; 89(2):116; author reply 117. PubMed ID: 16101695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates: results of a prospective multicenter study comparing pooled whole blood-derived platelets and apheresis platelets.
    Schrezenmeier H; Walther-Wenke G; Müller TH; Weinauer F; Younis A; Holland-Letz T; Geis G; Asmus J; Bauerfeind U; Burkhart J; Deitenbeck R; Förstemann E; Gebauer W; Höchsmann B; Karakassopoulos A; Liebscher UM; Sänger W; Schmidt M; Schunter F; Sireis W; Seifried E
    Transfusion; 2007 Apr; 47(4):644-52. PubMed ID: 17381623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of a pH meter for bacterial screening of whole blood platelets.
    Yazer MH; Triulzi DJ
    Transfusion; 2005 Jul; 45(7):1133-7. PubMed ID: 15987358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates].
    Araújo F; Alves V; Oliveira G; Fonseca C; Araújo AR
    Sangre (Barc); 1996 Dec; 41(6):483-4. PubMed ID: 9148429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bacterial contamination of whole-blood-derived platelets: the introduction of sample diversion and prestorage pooling with culture testing in the American Red Cross.
    Benjamin RJ; Kline L; Dy BA; Kennedy J; Pisciotto P; Sapatnekar S; Mercado R; Eder AF
    Transfusion; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2348-55. PubMed ID: 18657074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting bacterial contamination in platelet products.
    Palavecino EL; Yomtovian RA; Jacobs MR
    Clin Lab; 2006; 52(9-10):443-56. PubMed ID: 17078471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What happens when automated blood culture instrument detect growth but there are no technologists in the microbiology laboratory?
    Savinelli T; Parenteau S; Mermel LA
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Mar; 48(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 15023425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Six years' experience of using the BacT/ALERT system to screen all platelet concentrates, and additional testing of outdated platelet concentrates to estimate the frequency of false-negative results.
    Larsen CP; Ezligini F; Hermansen NO; Kjeldsen-Kragh J
    Vox Sang; 2005 Feb; 88(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15720606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bacterial detection in apheresis platelets: blood systems experience with a two-bottle and one-bottle culture system.
    Su LL; Kamel H; Custer B; Vanderpool S; Harpool D; Busch M; Tomasulo P
    Transfusion; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1842-52. PubMed ID: 18503612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between the BACTEC 9240 and the Pall eBDS system for detection of bacterial platelet concentrate contamination.
    Savini V; Balbinot A; Giancola R; Quaglietta A; Accorsi P; D'Antonio D; Iacone A
    Transfusion; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1217-23. PubMed ID: 19389034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sterility screening of platelet concentrates: questioning the optimal test strategy.
    Dreier J; Störmer M; Pichl L; Schottstedt V; Grolle A; Bux J; Kleesiek K
    Vox Sang; 2008 Oct; 95(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 19121182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
    Schmidt M; Karakassopoulos A; Burkhart J; Deitenbeck R; Asmus J; Müller TH; Weinauer F; Seifried E; Walther-Wenke G
    Vox Sang; 2007 Jan; 92(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17181586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.