BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15583566)

  • 41. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.
    Nissan J; Narobai D; Gross O; Ghelfan O; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22010095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Single-Unit Cement-Retained Implant Restorations: Strategies, Protocols, and Techniques.
    Schoenbaum T; Stevenson RG; Moshaverinia A
    Dent Today; 2017 Jun; 36(6):64-8. PubMed ID: 29231669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations.
    Karl M; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 17394911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cemented or screw-retained implant restorations: how do you decide?
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21613034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retrospective analysis of loosening of cement-retained vs screw-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions.
    Korsch M; Walther W
    Quintessence Int; 2015; 46(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 25918762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
    Chaar MS; Att W; Strub JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):697-711. PubMed ID: 21395638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of an occlusal screw-access hole on the fracture resistance of permanently cemented implant crowns: a laboratory study.
    Shadid RM; Abu-Naba'a L; Al-Omari WM; Asfar KR; El Masoud BM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 21519576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications.
    Ma S; Fenton A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):127-45. PubMed ID: 25822297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of Metal Extension of Crown in the Screw Access Channel of a Posterior Implant Abutment on the Retention of Cement Retained Prosthesis.
    Biyani R; Ali M; Belles D; Powers JM
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 23981084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cement Selection for Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Literature Review.
    Nematollahi F; Beyabanaki E; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Oct; 25(7):599-606. PubMed ID: 26488150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Clinical observation of screw and cement-retained implant-supported restoration of fixed bridges].
    Song T; Xu PC; Li Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Jun; 20(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 21779741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review.
    Wittneben JG; Millen C; Brägger U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():84-98. PubMed ID: 24660192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Template to determine the position and angulation of the abutment screw channel for implant-supported, cement-retained restorations.
    Lautensack J; Weber V; Wolfart S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 22304749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
    Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.
    Wittneben JG; Joda T; Weber HP; Brägger U
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 28000276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Minimizing excess cement in implant-supported fixed restorations using an extraoral replica technique: a prospective 1-year study.
    Frisch E; Ratka-Krüger P; Weigl P; Woelber J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1355-61. PubMed ID: 26574860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.