683 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15583648)
1. No Munich on GM crops.
Malvoisin P; Grausz JD
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1501; discussion 1501. PubMed ID: 15583648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Orphans at the window.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1055. PubMed ID: 15340451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Europe sees sharp decline in GMO research.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):468-9. PubMed ID: 12721556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. GM confusion in Brazil.
Bonalume Neto R
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1257-8. PubMed ID: 14595342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Italy employs further GMO delay tactics.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):346. PubMed ID: 12665808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Making 'safety first' a reality for biotechnology products.
Kapuscinski AR; Goodman RM; Hann SD; Jacobs LR; Pullins EE; Johnson CS; Kinsey JD; Krall RL; La Viña AG; Mellon MG; Ruttan VW
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):599-601. PubMed ID: 12776139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
Craddock N
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking US leadership in food biotechnology.
Taylor MR
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):852-4. PubMed ID: 12894194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recipe for disaster.
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):465. PubMed ID: 12721554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. EU reflects European public opinion.
Borch K; Lassen J; Jørgensen RB
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):976. PubMed ID: 12949553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The fear factor.
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):957. PubMed ID: 12355098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Transparent communication strategy on GMOs: will it change public opinion?
Sinemus K; Egelhofer M
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1141-6. PubMed ID: 17703492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First salvo in transatlantic food fight is far from last word.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):737-8. PubMed ID: 12833087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The WTO complaint--why now?
Kinderlerer J
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):735-6. PubMed ID: 12833086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Who is driving biotechnology acceptance?
Kalaitzandonakes N; Bijman J
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 12665818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
Oeschger MP; Silva CE
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Food fight. The battle heats up between the U.S. and Europe over genetically engineered crops.
Kluger J
Time; 1999 Sep; 154(11):42-4. PubMed ID: 10620918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
