These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Transboundary flow modeling: the Zohor depression of Austria and the Slovak Republic. Fendek M; Fendekova M Ground Water; 2005; 43(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 16149967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved water table dynamics in MODFLOW. Clemo T Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 15819948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An improved approach for assigning pumping rates to heterogeneous aquifer models. Pinales A; Chavez A; Llerar G; Manzanares L; Keer A Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 15819949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The development of new analytic elements for transient flow and multiaquifer flow. Strack OD Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 16405472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating hydraulic properties using a moving-model approach and multiple aquifer tests. Halford KJ; Yobbi D Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 16556210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for evaluating horizontal well pumping tests. Langseth DE; Smyth AH; May J Ground Water; 2004; 42(5):689-99. PubMed ID: 15457792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SEEPAGE, a new MODFLOW DRAIN package. Batelaan O; De Smedt F Ground Water; 2004; 42(4):576-88. PubMed ID: 15318780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A finite-volume ELLAM for three-dimensional solute-transport modeling. Russell TF; Heberton CI; Konikow LF; Hornberger GZ Ground Water; 2003; 41(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 12656292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydrostratigraphic modeling of a complex, glacial-drift aquifer system for importation into MODFLOW. Herzog BL; Larson DR; Abert CC; Wilson SD; Roadcap GS Ground Water; 2003; 41(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 12533076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Semi-Structured MODFLOW-USG Model to Evaluate Local Water Sources to Wells for Decision Support. Feinstein DT; Fienen MN; Reeves HW; Langevin CD Ground Water; 2016 Jul; 54(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 26757094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling of flow and contaminant transport in coupled stream-aquifer systems. Hussein M; Schwartz FW J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Aug; 65(1-2):41-64. PubMed ID: 12855200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling a Large-Scale Historic Aquifer Test: Insight into the Hydrogeology of a Regional Fault Zone. Hadley DR; Abrams DB; Roadcap GS Ground Water; 2020 May; 58(3):453-463. PubMed ID: 31290141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Stream-aquifer interactions: evaluation of depletion volume and residual effects from ground water pumping," by Xunhong Chen and Longcang Shu, May-June 2002 issue, v. 40, no. 3: 284-290. Zhang Q; Lockington DA Ground Water; 2003; 41(3):391-2; discussion 392. PubMed ID: 12772833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Well characteristics influencing arsenic concentrations in ground water. Erickson ML; Barnes RJ Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(16):4029-39. PubMed ID: 16135378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analytic element modeling of embedded multiaquifer domains. Bakker M Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 16405470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]