These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15584534)

  • 21. Forward field computation with OpenMEEG.
    Gramfort A; Papadopoulo T; Olivi E; Clerc M
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():923703. PubMed ID: 21437231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Line-source modeling and estimation with magnetoencephalography.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 52(5):839-51. PubMed ID: 15887533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neuroelectromagnetic forward head modeling toolbox.
    Acar ZA; Makeig S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jul; 190(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 20457183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ellipsoidal head model for fetal magnetoencephalography: forward and inverse solutions.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Preissl H
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2141-57. PubMed ID: 15843742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating parametric line-source models with electroencephalography.
    Cao N; Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2156-65. PubMed ID: 17073320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A precorrected-fFT method to accelerate the solution of the forward problem in magnetoencephalography.
    Tissari S; Rahola J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(4):523-41. PubMed ID: 12630746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of a priori information in estimating tissue resistivities--application to human data in vivo.
    Baysal U; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2004 Jun; 25(3):737-48. PubMed ID: 15253124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Brainstorm-DUNEuro: An integrated and user-friendly Finite Element Method for modeling electromagnetic brain activity.
    Medani T; Garcia-Prieto J; Tadel F; Antonakakis M; Erdbrügger T; Höltershinken M; Mead W; Schrader S; Joshi A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Mosher JC; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2023 Feb; 267():119851. PubMed ID: 36599389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of geometric head model perturbations on the EEG forward and inverse problems.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 16532768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computational modeling of human head electromagnetics for source localization of milliscale brain dynamics.
    Malony AD; Salman A; Turovets S; Tucker D; Volkov V; Li K; Song JE; Biersdorff S; Davey C; Hoge C; Hammond D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():329-35. PubMed ID: 21335813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography.
    Stenroos M; Hunold A; Haueisen J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():337-348. PubMed ID: 24434678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative performance of the finite element method and the boundary element fast multipole method for problems mimicking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
    Htet AT; Saturnino GB; Burnham EH; Noetscher GM; Nummenmaa A; Makarov SN
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):024001. PubMed ID: 30605893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
    Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New Strategy for Finite Element Mesh Generation for Accurate Solutions of Electroencephalography Forward Problems.
    Lee C; Im CH
    Brain Topogr; 2019 May; 32(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 30073558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.