BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15584812)

  • 1. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.
    Lamy D; Leber A; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1019-31. PubMed ID: 15584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
    Lamy D; Zoaris L
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by a static discontinuity between perceptual groups.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH; Naginsky Y; Thomas M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 20364921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonspatial interdimensional attentional capture.
    Inukai T; Kawahara J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):658-66. PubMed ID: 20348572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.
    Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15116988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
    Lamy D; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual search deficits in Parkinson's disease are attenuated by bottom-up target salience and top-down information.
    Horowitz TS; Choi WY; Horvitz JC; Côté LJ; Mangels JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1962-77. PubMed ID: 16580700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):640-54. PubMed ID: 19309292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: An empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Gardini S; Mascetti GG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):297-324. PubMed ID: 14742178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
    Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture.
    Wu SC; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1050-67. PubMed ID: 14585022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synergy of stimulus-driven salience and goal-directed prioritization: evidence from the spatial blink.
    Du F; Abrams RA
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1489-503. PubMed ID: 19064492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature integration theory revisited: dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search.
    Chan LK; Hayward WG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):119-32. PubMed ID: 19170475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
    Proulx MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.