These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15584812)
21. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm. Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Salience is only briefly represented: evidence from probe-detection performance. Donk M; Soesman L J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):286-302. PubMed ID: 20364919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search. Lamy D; Tsal Y Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Mar; 6(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 12199317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset? Yeh SL; Liao HI Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture. Burnham BR Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Jun; 14(3):392-422. PubMed ID: 17874581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Failures to see: attentive blank stares revealed by change blindness. Caplovitz GP; Fendrich R; Hughes HC Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):877-86. PubMed ID: 17931887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience. Lu S; Han S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The attention cascade model and attentional blink. Shih SI Cogn Psychol; 2008 May; 56(3):210-36. PubMed ID: 17624321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations. Tsal Y; Makovski T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 16634675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling. Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Attentional effects of negative faces: top-down contingent or involuntary? Horstmann G; Becker SI Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1416-34. PubMed ID: 19064487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]