These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15584812)

  • 21. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Salience is only briefly represented: evidence from probe-detection performance.
    Donk M; Soesman L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):286-302. PubMed ID: 20364919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.
    Lamy D; Tsal Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Mar; 6(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 12199317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset?
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.
    Ansorge U; Heumann M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):937-48. PubMed ID: 14585015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 20121291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.
    Burnham BR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Jun; 14(3):392-422. PubMed ID: 17874581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Failures to see: attentive blank stares revealed by change blindness.
    Caplovitz GP; Fendrich R; Hughes HC
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):877-86. PubMed ID: 17931887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.
    Lu S; Han S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The attention cascade model and attentional blink.
    Shih SI
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 May; 56(3):210-36. PubMed ID: 17624321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.
    Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4118-33. PubMed ID: 17005231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations.
    Tsal Y; Makovski T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 16634675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
    Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional effects of negative faces: top-down contingent or involuntary?
    Horstmann G; Becker SI
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1416-34. PubMed ID: 19064487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.