334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15584815)
1. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial attention modulates feature crosstalk in visual word processing.
Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):989-98. PubMed ID: 20436195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential modulation of word recognition by semantic and spatial orienting of attention.
Cristescu TC; Nobre AC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 May; 20(5):787-801. PubMed ID: 18201125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Symbolic control of visual attention: semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention.
Gibson BS; Scheutz M; Davis GJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):363-74. PubMed ID: 19304625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recognition intent and visual word recognition.
Wang MY; Ching CL
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 19036609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?
Borowsky R; Besner D
Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. PubMed ID: 16478310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing.
Estes Z; Jones LL
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 19203172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
Alija M; Cuetos F
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual word recognition: reattending to the role of spatial attention.
Stolz JA; McCann RS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1320-31. PubMed ID: 10946717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex.
Vossel S; Thiel CM; Fink GR
Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16846742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: evidence for nonselective lexical access.
Duyck W; Assche EV; Drieghe D; Hartsuiker RJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):663-79. PubMed ID: 17576146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semantic processing is affected in inhibition of return: evidence from an event-related potentials study.
Zhang M; Zhang Y
Neuroreport; 2007 Feb; 18(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 17314669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition.
Ferrand L; Grainger J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 12745841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spoken-word recognition: the access to embedded words.
Isel F; Bacri N
Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10433740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm.
Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J; Milliken B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 17469972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semantic priming from letter-searched primes occurs for low- but not high-frequency targets: automatic semantic access may not be a myth.
Tse CS; Neely JH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1143-61. PubMed ID: 17983319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
