These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15584845)

  • 1. Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations.
    Pollina DA; Dollins AB; Senter SM; Krapohl DJ; Ryan AH
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Dec; 89(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 15584845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial skin surface temperature changes during a "concealed information" test.
    Pollina DA; Dollins AB; Senter SM; Brown TE; Pavlidis I; Levine JA; Ryan AH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 34(7):1182-9. PubMed ID: 16786391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Salience of Guilty Knowledge Test items affects accuracy in realistic mock crimes.
    Jokinen A; Santtila P; Ravaja N; Puttonen S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 16766070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge.
    Gamer M; Rill HG; Vossel G; Gödert HW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Apr; 60(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 16005091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The court of public opinion: lay perceptions of polygraph testing.
    Myers B; Latter R; Abdollahi-Arena MK
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):509-23. PubMed ID: 16718577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tonic arousal during field polygraph tests in guilty vs. innocent suspects in Japan.
    Hira S; Furumitsu I
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19499326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The comparison question test: does it work and if so how?
    Offe H; Offe S
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):291-303. PubMed ID: 17123156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the validity of the guilty knowledge test from simulated experiments: the external validity of mock crime studies.
    Carmel D; Dayan E; Naveh A; Raveh O; Ben-Shakhar G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2003 Dec; 9(4):261-9. PubMed ID: 14664677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination.
    Gamer M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Apr; 76(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20114064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios.
    Mertens R; Allen JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 17995914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of biofeedback on the detection of deception.
    Timm HW
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 May; 32(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 3598524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in Behavior Analysis Interviews.
    Horvath F; Jayne B; Buckley J
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 May; 39(3):793-807. PubMed ID: 8006624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information.
    Elaad E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 18948149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of two types of control questions and two question formats on the outcomes of polygraph examinations.
    Horvath F; Palmatier JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 18554232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A field study on the validity of the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique.
    Mangan DJ; Armitage TE; Adams GC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):17-23; discussion 24-31. PubMed ID: 18436271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating orienting and defensive responses.
    Verschuere B; Crombez G; De Clercq A; Koster EH
    Psychophysiology; 2004 May; 41(3):461-6. PubMed ID: 15102132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Countering countermeasures in the concealed information test using covert respiration measures.
    Elaad E; Ben-Shakhar G
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 19543828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrodermal and phasic heart rate responses in the Guilty Actions Test: comparing guilty examinees to informed and uninformed innocents.
    Gamer M; Gödert HW; Keth A; Rill HG; Vossel G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jul; 69(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 18433904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.