These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Clark SE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Brewer N; Wells GL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications. Clark SE; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Administrator blindness affects the recording of eyewitness lineup outcomes. Rodriguez DN; Berry MA Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 31535891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Clark SE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration. MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy. Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eyewitness identification accuracy: a comparison of adults with and those without intellectual disabilities. Ericson K; Isaacs B Ment Retard; 2003 Jun; 41(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 12737610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating investigators: examining the impact of eyewitness identification evidence on student-investigators. Boyce MA; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 18060486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups. Steblay NK Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification. Baldassari MJ; Moore KN; Hyman IE; Hope L; Mah EY; Lindsay DS; Mansour J; Saraiva R; Horry R; Rath H; Kelly L; Jones R; Vale S; Lawson B; Pedretti J; Palma TA; Cruz F; Quarenta J; Van der Cruyssen I; Mileva M; Allen J; Jeye B; Wiechert S Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Feb; 8(1):16. PubMed ID: 36854842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]