These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15585053)
1. Two subtypes or more, much work remains: a commentary on Windle and Scheidt. Del Boca FK Addiction; 2004 Dec; 99(12):1609-10. PubMed ID: 15585053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Splitting lumps: type B or not type B; that is the question: a comment on Windle & Scheidt. Ball SA Addiction; 2004 Dec; 99(12):1610-1. PubMed ID: 15585054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Subtypes of substance dependence and abuse: implications for diagnostic classification and empirical research. Babor TF; Caetano R Addiction; 2006 Sep; 101 Suppl 1():104-10. PubMed ID: 16930166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alcoholic subtypes--how do they mesh with clinical practice? Caetano R Addiction; 2004 Dec; 99(12):1608-9. PubMed ID: 15585052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The future of the alcohol dependence syndrome (ads): possible challenges from more rigorous psychological measurement. Dickerson M Addiction; 2007 Oct; 102(10):1532-3; discussion 1537-8. PubMed ID: 17854328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Are there empirically supported and clinically useful subtypes of alcohol dependence? Hesselbrock VM; Hesselbrock MN Addiction; 2006 Sep; 101 Suppl 1():97-103. PubMed ID: 16930165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using design effects from previous cluster surveys to guide sample size calculation in emergency settings. Kaiser R; Woodruff BA; Bilukha O; Spiegel PB; Salama P Disasters; 2006 Jun; 30(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 16689918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Type A-Type B classification in a community sample of problem drinkers: structural and predictive validity. Carpenter KM; Liu X; Hasin DS Addict Behav; 2006 Jan; 31(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 15908135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical cluster analysis of pharmaceutical solvents. Xu D; Redman-Furey N Int J Pharm; 2007 Jul; 339(1-2):175-88. PubMed ID: 17433585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design of trials with dying patients: a feasibility study of cluster randomisation versus randomised consent. Fowell A; Johnstone R; Finlay IG; Russell D; Russell IT Palliat Med; 2006 Dec; 20(8):799-804. PubMed ID: 17148534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cluster analysis in family psychology research. Henry DB; Tolan PH; Gorman-Smith D J Fam Psychol; 2005 Mar; 19(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 15796658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The merits of breaking the matches: a cautionary tale. Donner A; Taljaard M; Klar N Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):2036-51. PubMed ID: 16927437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction. Murphy AW; Esterman A; Pilotto LS Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 16945880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The design effect and cluster samples: optimising tuberculosis prevalence surveys. Williams B; Gopi PG; Borgdorff MW; Yamada N; Dye C Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2008 Oct; 12(10):1110-5. PubMed ID: 18812038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]