These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15585577)
1. Interaction of 14-3-3 protein with Chk1 affects localization and checkpoint function. Dunaway S; Liu HY; Walworth NC J Cell Sci; 2005 Jan; 118(Pt 1):39-50. PubMed ID: 15585577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phosphorylation activates Chk1 and is required for checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest. Capasso H; Palermo C; Wan S; Rao H; John UP; O'Connell MJ; Walworth NC J Cell Sci; 2002 Dec; 115(Pt 23):4555-64. PubMed ID: 12415000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of Chk1 with 14-3-3 proteins is stimulated by DNA damage. Chen L; Liu TH; Walworth NC Genes Dev; 1999 Mar; 13(6):675-85. PubMed ID: 10090724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The topoisomerase I poison camptothecin generates a Chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint signal in fission yeast. Wan S; Capasso H; Walworth NC Yeast; 1999 Jul; 15(10A):821-8. PubMed ID: 10407262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of a C-terminal conserved region of Chk1 for checkpoint function. Palermo C; Hope JC; Freyer GA; Rao H; Walworth NC PLoS One; 2008 Jan; 3(1):e1427. PubMed ID: 18183307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nuclear localization of Cdc25 is regulated by DNA damage and a 14-3-3 protein. Lopez-Girona A; Furnari B; Mondesert O; Russell P Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6715):172-5. PubMed ID: 9923681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulation of checkpoint kinases through dynamic interaction with Crb2. Mochida S; Esashi F; Aono N; Tamai K; O'Connell MJ; Yanagida M EMBO J; 2004 Jan; 23(2):418-28. PubMed ID: 14739927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chk1 is a wee1 kinase in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation. O'Connell MJ; Raleigh JM; Verkade HM; Nurse P EMBO J; 1997 Feb; 16(3):545-54. PubMed ID: 9034337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hyphal differentiation induced via a DNA damage checkpoint-dependent pathway engaged in crosstalk with nutrient stress signaling in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Furuya K; Niki H Curr Genet; 2012 Dec; 58(5-6):291-303. PubMed ID: 23090706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human Raf-1 proteins associate with Rad24 and Cdc25 in cell-cycle checkpoint pathway of fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Lee M; Yoo HS J Cell Biochem; 2007 May; 101(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 17243098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Serine-345 is required for Rad3-dependent phosphorylation and function of checkpoint kinase Chk1 in fission yeast. Lopez-Girona A; Tanaka K; Chen XB; Baber BA; McGowan CH; Russell P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Sep; 98(20):11289-94. PubMed ID: 11553781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1. Saka Y; Esashi F; Matsusaka T; Mochida S; Yanagida M Genes Dev; 1997 Dec; 11(24):3387-400. PubMed ID: 9407031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. p56(chk1) protein kinase is required for the DNA replication checkpoint at 37 degrees C in fission yeast. Francesconi S; Grenon M; Bouvier D; Baldacci G EMBO J; 1997 Mar; 16(6):1332-41. PubMed ID: 9135148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antagonism of Chk1 signaling in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint by dominant alleles of Cdr1. Calonge TM; O'Connell MJ Genetics; 2006 Sep; 174(1):113-23. PubMed ID: 16816416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fission yeast chk1 protein kinase links the rad checkpoint pathway to cdc2. Walworth N; Davey S; Beach D Nature; 1993 May; 363(6427):368-71. PubMed ID: 8497322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel genetic screen identifies checkpoint-defective alleles of Schizosaccharomyces pombe chk1. Wan S; Walworth NC Curr Genet; 2001 Jan; 38(6):299-306. PubMed ID: 11270571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fission yeast chk1 mutants show distinct responses to different types of DNA damaging treatments. Francesconi S; Smeets M; Grenon M; Tillit J; Blaisonneau J; Baldacci G Genes Cells; 2002 Jul; 7(7):663-73. PubMed ID: 12081644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]