171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15585805)
1. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements.
Peltola JS; Mattila M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 15585805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
Mehra A; Pai KM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Localisation of the mandibular canal using conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study.
Bou Serhal C; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 11359480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
Shelley AM; Brunton P; Horner K
J Dent; 2011 Nov; 39(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 21875641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for cross-sectional implant site assessment in the posterior mandible.
Rashedi B; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Chaffee NR; Guckes AD
J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 14508739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of mandibular cross-sectional imaging with tuned- aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, and multidirectional, linear, and transverse panoramic tomography.
Liang H; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Lang LA; Nunn ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 11346741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Flygare L; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11803387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ.
Wiese M; Hintze H; Svensson P; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17329582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical evaluation of some factors affecting image quality in panoramic radiography.
Kaeppler G; Axmann-Krcmar D; Reuter I; Meyle J; Gómez-Román G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 10808220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
Gher ME; Richardson AC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment.
Kassebaum DK; Nummikoski PV; Triplett RG; Langlais RP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 2234889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric tomography - a new tomographic technique for panoramic units.
Cederlund A; Kalke M; Welander U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 19176653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
