These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15585805)

  • 21. Cross-sectional imaging of the jaws for dental implant treatment: accuracy of linear tomography using a panoramic machine in comparison with reformatted computed tomography.
    Naitoh M; Kawamata A; Iida H; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 11858566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
    Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. E.A.O. guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin.
    Harris D; Buser D; Dula K; Grondahl K; Haris D; Jacobs R; Lekholm U; Nakielny R; van Steenberghe D; van der Stelt P;
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Oct; 13(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 12674118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blur reduction of conventional film-based tomograms for pre-surgical evaluation of potential mandibular implant sites.
    Mayfield-Donahoo TL; Stokely EM; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 9150041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: the Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit.
    Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC; Schneeberger P; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 11402291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography.
    Suomalainen A; Vehmas T; Kortesniemi M; Robinson S; Peltola J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 18195249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen in panoramic radiographs: intraexaminer agreement.
    Shibli JA; Martins MC; Loffredo LC; Scaf G
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Feb; 38(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 20553129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
    Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles.
    Batenburg RH; Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 9347510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of over- and underexposure on the sharpness of the image of a marker in computer-assisted dental implant tomography.
    Thunthy KH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12087446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
    Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
    Frei C; Buser D; Dula K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of mandibular implant sites: correlation between panoramic and linear tomography.
    Rockenbach MI; Sampaio MC; Costa LJ; Costa NP
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15057399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.