These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15585807)

  • 1. Impact of ambient lighting intensity and duration on the signal-to-noise ratio of images from photostimulable phosphor plates processed using DenOptix and ScanX systems.
    Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 15585807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time and motion study: a comparison of two photostimulable phosphor imaging systems used in dentistry.
    Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 16940478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Does Ambient Light Affect the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography? A Quantitative Analysis Using Contemporary Digital Radiographic Systems.
    Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Wanderley VA; Ambrosano GMB; Pauwels R; Oliveira ML
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
    Couture RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alternative erasing times of the DenOptix system plate: performance on the detection of proximal caries.
    Melo DP; Pontual AA; Almeida SM; Campos PF; Tosoni GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 18656395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality in partially erased DenOptix storage phosphor plates.
    Lopes SL; Cruz AD; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18425250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does signal fade on photo-stimulable storage phosphor imaging plates when scanned with a delay and what is the effect on image quality?
    Ang DB; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 17052646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates: is there a safe limit for acceptable image quality?
    Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Oct; 52(7):20230174. PubMed ID: 37493608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons of physical imaging properties among three kinds of imaging plates used in photostimulable phosphor systems for dental radiography.
    Nishikawa K; Ooguro T; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2002 Feb; 43(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12013822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the deterioration of photostimulable phosphor plates.
    Souza-Pinto GN; Santaella GM; Coli AA; Oenning AC; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190500. PubMed ID: 32302219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment.
    Kalathingal SM; Shrout MK; Comer C; Brady C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Mar; 39(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 20203281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions.
    Martins MG; Haiter Neto F; Whaites EJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12917285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department.
    Chiu HL; Lin SH; Chen CH; Wang WC; Chen JY; Chen YK; Lin LM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):749-56. PubMed ID: 18547836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
    Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How many times can we use a phosphor plate? A preliminary study.
    Ergün S; Güneri P; Ilgüy D; Ilgüy M; Boyacioglu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19114423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.