These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15585809)

  • 21. A simplified method to obtain perceptibility curves for direct dental digital radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 10522200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptibility curves for the Digora system.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Matsuo T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12917286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 10455386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual linearization of the display of digital radiographs.
    Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Sällstrom P; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 12076054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of 4 Commercial Viewing Devices for Radiographic Perceptibility and Working Length Determination.
    Lally T; Geist JR; Yu Q; Himel VT; Sabey K
    J Endod; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25863405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Orthodontic application of color image addition to visualize differences between sequential radiographs.
    Papika S; Paulsen HU; Shi XQ; Welander U; Linder-Aronson S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 May; 115(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 10229879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are collimated low-dose digital radiographs valid for performing Delaire's architectural analysis?
    Stamm T; Meier N; Hohoff A; Meyer U; Heinecke A; Joos U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 32(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 14636609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessments of the physical performance of 2 generations of 2 direct digital intraoral sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Oct; 88(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 10519766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth.
    Alghazali N; Burnside G; Moallem M; Smith P; Preston A; Jarad FD
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e10-7. PubMed ID: 22561647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative study on diagnostic accuracy of colour coded digital images, direct digital images and conventional radiographs for periapical lesions - an in vitro study.
    Pati AR; Mubeen ; K R V; Bhuyan SK; Panigrahi RG; Priyadarshini SR; Misra S; Singh C
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Nov; 8(11):ZC55-9. PubMed ID: 25584318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Observer performance in the assessment of contract enhanced CT: effects of contrast medium and grey scale window on detection of defects in a simulated peripheral rim border.
    Wakoh M; Yamamoto K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 8689743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of image translation table on diagnostic efficacy of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies.
    Siennicki J; Kuśmierek J; Kovacevic-Kuśmierek K; Bieńkiewicz M; Chiżyński K; Płachcińska A
    Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2010; 13(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21598229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can dentists recognize manipulated digital radiographs?
    Visser H; Krüger W
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 9446993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Colour thresholding in video imaging.
    Fermin CD; Degraw S
    J Anat; 1995 Jun; 186 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):469-81. PubMed ID: 7559121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preliminary evaluation of display format effects on perceptibility in a low contrast ultrasound test object.
    Sommer FG; Orphanoudakis SC; Taylor KJ
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 7322042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Evaluation of computerized tomograms using a black and white and a color monitor: an ROC (receiver operation characteristic) comparison].
    Rockstroh G; Rotte KH; Kriedemann E; Cobet H; Boitz F; Cimanowski N
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Sep; 7(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 3677552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry.
    Khashayar G; Bain PA; Salari S; Dozic A; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):637-44. PubMed ID: 24334221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.