127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15586224)
1. Characterization of chromosome 3q and 12q amplicons in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines.
Or YY; Hui AB; Tam KY; Huang DP; Lo KW
Int J Oncol; 2005 Jan; 26(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 15586224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A simple specific pattern of chromosomal aberrations at early stages of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: PIK3CA but not p63 gene as a likely target of 3q26-qter gains.
Redon R; Muller D; Caulee K; Wanherdrick K; Abecassis J; du Manoir S
Cancer Res; 2001 May; 61(10):4122-9. PubMed ID: 11358835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis identified cyclin D1 as a target oncogene at 11q13.3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Hui AB; Or YY; Takano H; Tsang RK; To KF; Guan XY; Sham JS; Hung KW; Lam CN; van Hasselt CA; Kuo WL; Gray JW; Huang DP; Lo KW
Cancer Res; 2005 Sep; 65(18):8125-33. PubMed ID: 16166286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of a novel 12p13.3 amplicon in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Or YY; Chung GT; To KF; Chow C; Choy KW; Tong CY; Leung AW; Hui AB; Tsao SW; Ng HK; Yip TT; Busson P; Lo KW
J Pathol; 2010 Jan; 220(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 19718711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chromosome 3p12.3-p14.2 and 3q26.2-q26.32 are genomic markers for prognosis of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Sheu JJ; Lee CH; Ko JY; Tsao GS; Wu CC; Fang CY; Tsai FJ; Hua CH; Chen CL; Chen JY
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Oct; 18(10):2709-16. PubMed ID: 19815638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genotypic analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by molecular cytogenetics and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Yen CC; Chen YJ; Lu KH; Hsia JY; Chen JT; Hu CP; Chen PM; Liu JH; Chiou TJ; Wang WS; Yang MH; Chao TC; Lin CH
Int J Oncol; 2003 Oct; 23(4):871-81. PubMed ID: 12963965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of 3p, 5p, and 3q in two nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines, using region-specific multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization probes.
Tjia WM; Sham JS; Hu L; Tai AL; Guan XY
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15771906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Molecular genetic progression on nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Shao JY; Zeng WF; Zeng YX
Ai Zheng; 2002 Jan; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12500388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amplicons on chromosome 3 contain oncogenes induced by recurrent exposure to 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate and sodium n-butyrate and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line.
Lee CH; Fang CY; Sheu JJ; Chang Y; Takada K; Chen JY
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Aug; 185(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18656687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic profiling of chromosome 1 in breast cancer: mapping of regions of gains and losses and identification of candidate genes on 1q.
Orsetti B; Nugoli M; Cervera N; Lasorsa L; Chuchana P; Rougé C; Ursule L; Nguyen C; Bibeau F; Rodriguez C; Theillet C
Br J Cancer; 2006 Nov; 95(10):1439-47. PubMed ID: 17060936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of candidate molecular markers of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by microarray analysis of subtracted cDNA libraries constructed by suppression subtractive hybridization.
Zhou Y; Zeng Z; Zhang W; Xiong W; Li X; Zhang B; Yi W; Xiao L; Wu M; Shen S; Li X; Cao L; Tang K; Li G
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(6):561-71. PubMed ID: 18941378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tong CY; Hui AB; Yin XL; Pang JC; Zhu XL; Poon WS; Ng HK
J Neurosurg; 2004 Feb; 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):187-93. PubMed ID: 14758948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional and array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinomas from the Mediterranean area.
Rodriguez S; Khabir A; Keryer C; Perrot C; Drira M; Ghorbel A; Jlidi R; Bernheim A; Valent A; Busson P
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Mar; 157(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 15721635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined array comparative genomic hybridization and tissue microarray analysis suggest PAK1 at 11q13.5-q14 as a critical oncogene target in ovarian carcinoma.
Schraml P; Schwerdtfeger G; Burkhalter F; Raggi A; Schmidt D; Ruffalo T; King W; Wilber K; Mihatsch MJ; Moch H
Am J Pathol; 2003 Sep; 163(3):985-92. PubMed ID: 12937139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High resolution allelotype of microdissected primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Lo KW; Teo PM; Hui AB; To KF; Tsang YS; Chan SY; Mak KF; Lee JC; Huang DP
Cancer Res; 2000 Jul; 60(13):3348-53. PubMed ID: 10910036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and refinement of 3q amplification.
Singh B; Gogineni SK; Sacks PG; Shaha AR; Shah JP; Stoffel A; Rao PH
Cancer Res; 2001 Jun; 61(11):4506-13. PubMed ID: 11389082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel chromosomal alterations detected in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization.
Yan J; Fang Y; Liang Q; Huang Y; Zeng Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 2001 Apr; 114(4):418-21. PubMed ID: 11780468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chromosomal aberrations in nasopharyngeal carcinoma analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization.
Chen YJ; Ko JY; Chen PJ; Shu CH; Hsu MT; Tsai SF; Lin CH
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Jun; 25(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 10338001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome-wide-array-based comparative genomic hybridization reveals genetic homogeneity and frequent copy number increases encompassing CCNE1 in fallopian tube carcinoma.
Snijders AM; Nowee ME; Fridlyand J; Piek JM; Dorsman JC; Jain AN; Pinkel D; van Diest PJ; Verheijen RH; Albertson DG
Oncogene; 2003 Jul; 22(27):4281-6. PubMed ID: 12833150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Chromosomal aberration analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization in nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Li Z; Wang L; Zhang X; Zhang L; Zhang B; Yu Y; Zeng Z; Zhou M; Huang W; Chen Z; Chen S; Li G
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 18(5):338-42. PubMed ID: 11592038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
