173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15586921)
1. Court rules that government can't outlaw type of abortion: a Nebraska case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2000 Jun; ():A1. PubMed ID: 15586921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
Walther KE
Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban.
Preston J
N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
Joersz M
N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
Guenther H
Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State's partial-birth abortion ban supported.
Chopko M; Moses M
Origins; 2000 Mar; 29(38):617-23. PubMed ID: 11913443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stenberg v. Carhart: have the states lost their power to regulate abortion?
Gauthier AM
New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(3):625-68. PubMed ID: 15212038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
Schmutz SD
Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
Gough AD
Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
Heffernan L
Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
Berkowitz JF
J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Candor and the court: the Supreme Court will confront as never before the violent nature of mid- and later-term abortion.
Stith R
America (NY); 2000 Apr; 182(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 11913437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Appeals court voids ban on 'partial birth' abortions: U.S. law most likely headed to justices.
Preston J
N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul; ():A11. PubMed ID: 16060016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Possible ban on abortion technique leaves doctors uneasy.
Duenwald M
N Y Times Web; 2003 Apr; ():F5, F8. PubMed ID: 12812228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
Borgmann CE
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Partial birth" abortion and the health exception: protecting maternal health or risking abortion on demand?
Glidewell G
Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Apr; 28(4):1089-150. PubMed ID: 12680381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
Kushnir TF
Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely!
Massie AM
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
