129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15586931)
1. A jailed expectant mom--and a case of tangled rights.
Axtman K
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Sep; 92(202):2. PubMed ID: 15586931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
Cherry AL
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
Bower HR
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
Arch RR
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reply to Sarah Burns.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A case of fetal rights. Massachusetts mandates pregnancy care.
Cannon A
US News World Rep; 2000 Sep; 129(12):31. PubMed ID: 11183311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Court-ordered care--a complication of pregnancy to avoid.
Cantor JD
N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(24):2237-40. PubMed ID: 22693994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pregnant embodiment and women's autonomy rights in law: an analysis of the language and politics of Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.
Randall M
Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(2):515-42. PubMed ID: 12769105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
Hyams R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Canadian Charter as a barrier to unwanted medical treatment of pregnant women in the interests of the foetus.
Jackman M
Health Law Can; 1993; 14(2):49-58. PubMed ID: 10131254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Melissa Rowland and the rights of pregnant women.
Habiba M
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1147-8; author reply 1148. PubMed ID: 15863560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework.
Sterns ML
New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far?
Trindel RM
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: the balancing of maternal and fetal rights.
Harris P
Clevel State Law Rev; 2001; 49(1):133-61. PubMed ID: 15212015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A maternal duty to protect fetal health?
Weinberg SR
Indiana Law J; 1983; 58(3):531-46. PubMed ID: 16211746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A Violent Birth: Reframing Coerced Procedures During Childbirth as Obstetric Violence.
Borges MT
Duke Law J; 2018 Jan; 67(4):827-62. PubMed ID: 29469554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconciling fetal/maternal conflicts.
Kim RH
Ida Law Rev; 1990-1991; 27(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 16032814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns.
Shultz MM
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
