172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15587000)
1. Surgical prioritisation and rationing: some recent changes.
Derrett S
N Z Bioeth J; 2001 Oct; 2(3):3-6. PubMed ID: 15587000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Central RHA sets interim booking system thresholds.
N Z Health Hospital; 1997; 49(1):4, 6-7. PubMed ID: 10172956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The acceptability of waiting times for elective general surgery and the appropriateness of prioritising patients.
Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR; Rietberg M; Knol DL; van der Wal G
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Feb; 7():32. PubMed ID: 17328816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of criteria for the prioritisation of patients for elective general surgery.
MacCormick A; Macmillan A; Parry B
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2004 Jan; 9(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 15006237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How fair is cataract prioritisation?
Halliwell T
N Z Med J; 1998 Oct; 111(1076):405-7. PubMed ID: 9830430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Explicit rationing of elective services: implementing the New Zealand reforms.
Dew K; Cumming J; McLeod D; Morgan S; McKinlay E; Dowell A; Love T
Health Policy; 2005 Sep; 74(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16098407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Waiting lists. Listless feeling.
Kipping R
Health Serv J; 1998 Jul; 108(5613):26-7. PubMed ID: 10182617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Solving the surgical waiting list problem? New Zealand's 'booking system'.
Gauld R; Derrett S
Int J Health Plann Manage; 2000; 15(4):259-72. PubMed ID: 11246897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Priority access criteria for elective cholecystectomy: a comparison of three scoring methods.
Dennett ER; Kipping RR; Parry BR; Windsor J
N Z Med J; 1998 Jun; 111(1068):231-3. PubMed ID: 9695752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical priorities. Points make prizes.
Adams P
Health Serv J; 1999 Nov; 109(5682):30-1. PubMed ID: 11067479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should the proposed changes in the OPTN regulations include kidneys?
James-Hartwell L
Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Aug; 12(8):26, 31. PubMed ID: 10577136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Admission waiting times: a national survey.
Jacobs P; Hart W
Dimens Health Serv; 1990 Feb; 67(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 2311835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Geographic favoritism in liver transplantation.
Freeman RB
N Engl J Med; 1999 Mar; 340(12):963; author reply 964-5. PubMed ID: 10094639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Allocation of scarce resources: assessment and impact.
Gross M
Can J Surg; 2002 Feb; 45(1):8. PubMed ID: 11837930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prioritisation of elective surgery in New Zealand: The Reliability Study.
Doughty C; MacCormick A; Roake J; Fraser J; Hider P; Kirk R; Parry B; van Rij A; Theis JC
N Z Med J; 2005 Jul; 118(1219):U1590. PubMed ID: 16059410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geographic favoritism in liver transplantation.
Markowitz JS
N Engl J Med; 1999 Mar; 340(12):964; author reply 964-5. PubMed ID: 10094642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Waiting for elective surgery: a qualitative analysis and conceptual framework of the consequences of delay.
Hilkhuysen GL; Oudhoff JP; Rietberg M; van der Wal G; Timmermans DR
Public Health; 2005 Apr; 119(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 15733689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Wait times and health care resources.
Waddell JP
Can J Surg; 2004 Dec; 47(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 15646437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurses play key role in choice schemes.
Hartley J
Nurs Times; 2004 Feb 17-23; 100(7):10-1. PubMed ID: 15005026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rationing in the emergency department: the good, the bad, and the unacceptable.
Cross E; Goodacre S; O'Cathain A; Arnold J
Emerg Med J; 2005 Mar; 22(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 15735262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
