These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15587102)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of simple fixed space maintainers bonded with flow composite resin.
    Simsek S; Yilmaz Y; Gurbuz T
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 15587102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fixed space maintainers combined with open-face stainless steel crowns.
    Yilmaz Y; Kocogullari ME; Belduz N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 16685300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Success of reinforced fiber material space maintainers.
    Kirzioğlu Z; Ertürk MS
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 15587101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glass fiber-reinforced composite resin as fixed space maintainers in children: 12-month clinical follow-up.
    Kargul B; Caglar E; Kabalay U
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2005; 72(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 16568916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct bonding applied to space maintenance.
    Swaine TJ; Wright GZ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1976; 43(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 789420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glass fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer: case reports.
    Kargul B; Caglar E; Kabalay U
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 14998212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of survival of space maintainers: a six-year follow-up study.
    Tulunoglu O; Ulusu T; Genç Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 15719079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance and survival of space maintainers: evaluation over a period of 5 years.
    Rajab LD
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(2):156-60, 124. PubMed ID: 12515058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glass fiber-reinforced composite resin as a space maintainer: a clinical study.
    Subramaniam P; Babu G; Sunny R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008; 26 Suppl 3():S98-103. PubMed ID: 19127025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct bonded space maintainers.
    Santos VL; Almeida MA; Mello HS; Keith O
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1993; 17(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 8217886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load distribution in fixed space maintainers: a strain-gauge analysis.
    Kara NB; Çehreli S; Sağırkaya E; Karasoy D
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):E19-22. PubMed ID: 23635889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and testing of fiber-reinforced composite space maintainers.
    Kulkarni G; Lau D; Hafezi S
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 19941762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical efficiency of two different types of direct bonded space maintainers.
    Artun J; Marstrander PB
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1983; 50(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 6348110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of glass fiber reinforced composite resin as a space maintainer and its comparison with the conventional band and loop space maintainer. An in vivo study.
    Nidhi C; Jain RL; Neeraj M; Harsimrat K; Samriti B; Anuj C
    Minerva Stomatol; 2012; 61(1-2):21-30. PubMed ID: 22274307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of survival of 3 different fixed space maintainers.
    Tunc ES; Bayrak S; Tuloglu N; Egilmez T; Isci D
    Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(4):e97-102. PubMed ID: 23014081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of water flow rate on shear bond strength of resin composite to Er:YAG cavity preparation.
    Colucci V; Lucisano MP; do Amaral FL; Pécora JD; Palma-Dibb RG; Corona SA
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 18578182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.