These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15587650)

  • 21. Accurate two-dimensional IMRT verification using a back-projection EPID dosimetry method.
    Wendling M; Louwe RJ; McDermott LN; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 16532930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Hong TS; Tomé WA; Chappell RJ; Chinnaiyan P; Mehta MP; Harari PM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):779-88. PubMed ID: 15708257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
    Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automatic marker detection and 3D position reconstruction using cine EPID images for SBRT verification.
    Park SJ; Ionascu D; Hacker F; Mamon H; Berbeco R
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4536-46. PubMed ID: 19928085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of MVCT protocols for brain and head and neck tumor patients treated with helical tomotherapy.
    Vaandering A; Lee JA; Renard L; Grégoire V
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 19515441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of DVH parameter changes due to setup errors for breast cancer treatment based on 2D portal dosimetry.
    Nijsten SM; van Elmpt WJ; Mijnheer BJ; Minken AW; Persoon LC; Lambin P; Dekker AL
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 19235376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of a method for in vivo 3D dose reconstruction for IMRT and VMAT treatments using on-treatment EPID images and a model-based forward-calculation algorithm.
    Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; McCowan PM; Chytyk-Praznik K; Greer PB; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6945-54. PubMed ID: 26632050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel method for estimating SBRT delivered dose with beam's-eye-view images.
    Berbeco RI; Hacker F; Zatwarnicki C; Park SJ; Ionascu D; O'Farrell D; Mamon HJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3225-31. PubMed ID: 18697547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A prospective analysis of inter- and intrafractional errors to calculate CTV to PTV margins in head and neck patients.
    Cacicedo J; Perez JF; Ortiz de Zarate R; del Hoyo O; Casquero F; Gómez-Iturriaga A; Lasso A; Boveda E; Bilbao P
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2015 Feb; 17(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 25037850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.
    Mubata CD; Bidmead AM; Ellingham LM; Thompson V; Dearnaley DP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 9422580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of three-dimensional set-up errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging device.
    Bayoumi Y; Al-Amro A; Moniem RA; Sohaibani I; Al-Hanafy O; Alawadi AS; Asiri M
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2009 Jul; (6):35-40. PubMed ID: 20194089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of interfraction patient setup for head-and-neck cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy using multiple computed tomography-based image guidance.
    Qi XS; Hu AY; Lee SP; Lee P; DeMarco J; Li XA; Steinberg ML; Kupelian P; Low D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jul; 86(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 23474111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Initial clinical experience with Epid-based in-vivo dosimetry for VMAT treatments of head-and-neck tumors.
    Cilla S; Meluccio D; Fidanzio A; Azario L; Ianiro A; Macchia G; Digesù C; Deodato F; Valentini V; Morganti AG; Piermattei A
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 26511150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of geometric uncertainties using electronic portal imaging device in focal three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy using different head supports.
    Budrukkar A; Dutta D; Sharma D; Yadav P; Dantas S; Jalali R
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2008; 4(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 18688122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
    Gordon JJ; Crimaldi AJ; Hagan M; Moore J; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 17278506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
    Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measurements of patient's setup variation in intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancer using electronic portal imaging device.
    Naiyanet N; Oonsiri S; Lertbutsayanukul C; Suriyapee S
    Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2007 Jan; 3(1):e30. PubMed ID: 21614263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Setup error of electronic portal image device in IMRT for thoracic tumors and its influence.
    Chen QS; Zhao YH; Chen X; Xu JK; Gao Q; Zhu JY
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Dec; 27(24):12012-12020. PubMed ID: 38164863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of patient setup in the seated treatment position: A novel treatment chair design.
    McCarroll RE; Beadle BM; Fullen D; Balter PA; Followill DS; Stingo FC; Yang J; Court LE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):223-229. PubMed ID: 28291911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
    George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.