116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15587980)
1. Evaluating methods for classifying expression data.
Man MZ; Dyson G; Johnson K; Liao B
J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):1065-84. PubMed ID: 15587980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
Zeng T; Liu J
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification.
Jiang W; Simon R
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5320-34. PubMed ID: 17624926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
Huang DS; Zheng CH
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
Varma S; Simon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Support vector machine regression (SVR/LS-SVM)--an alternative to neural networks (ANN) for analytical chemistry? Comparison of nonlinear methods on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data.
Balabin RM; Lomakina EI
Analyst; 2011 Apr; 136(8):1703-12. PubMed ID: 21350755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving gene expression cancer molecular pattern discovery using nonnegative principal component analysis.
Han X
Genome Inform; 2008; 21():200-11. PubMed ID: 19425159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Partial least squares dimension reduction for microarray gene expression data with a censored response.
Nguyen DV
Math Biosci; 2005 Jan; 193(1):119-37. PubMed ID: 15681279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
Wang M; Chen JY
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliable gene signatures for microarray classification: assessment of stability and performance.
Davis CA; Gerick F; Hintermair V; Friedel CC; Fundel K; Küffner R; Zimmer R
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2356-63. PubMed ID: 16882647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of principal component analysis and the GE-biplot for the graphical exploration of gene expression data.
Pittelkow Y; Wilson SR
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):630-2; discussion 632-4. PubMed ID: 16011715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multivariate exploratory tools for microarray data analysis.
Szabo A; Boucher K; Jones D; Tsodikov AD; Klebanov LB; Yakovlev AY
Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):555-67. PubMed ID: 14557111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Borrowing information from relevant microarray studies for sample classification using weighted partial least squares.
Huang X; Pan W; Han X; Chen Y; Miller LW; Hall J
Comput Biol Chem; 2005 Jun; 29(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 15979040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of gene transcript signatures predictive for estrogen receptor and lymph node status using a stepwise forward selection artificial neural network modelling approach.
Lancashire LJ; Rees RC; Ball GR
Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jun; 43(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 18420392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification from microarray data using probabilistic discriminant partial least squares with reject option.
Botella C; Ferré J; Boqué R
Talanta; 2009 Nov; 80(1):321-8. PubMed ID: 19782232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimension reduction for classification with gene expression microarray data.
Dai JJ; Lieu L; Rocke D
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article6. PubMed ID: 16646870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gene expression data classification using locally linear discriminant embedding.
Li B; Zheng CH; Huang DS; Zhang L; Han K
Comput Biol Med; 2010 Oct; 40(10):802-10. PubMed ID: 20864095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene functional annotation by statistical analysis of biomedical articles.
Theodosiou T; Angelis L; Vakali A; Thomopoulos GN
Int J Med Inform; 2007 Aug; 76(8):601-13. PubMed ID: 16781189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recursive gene selection based on maximum margin criterion: a comparison with SVM-RFE.
Niijima S; Kuhara S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():543. PubMed ID: 17187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
