389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15588556)
1. Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?
Dalziel K; Round A; Stein K; Garside R; Castelnuovo E; Payne L
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jan; 9(2):iii-iv, 1-146. PubMed ID: 15588556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association between methodological characteristics and outcome in health technology assessments which included case series.
Stein K; Dalziel K; Garside R; Castelnuovo E; Round A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 16110706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.
Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appraisals by Health Technology Assessment Agencies of Economic Evaluations Submitted as Part of Reimbursement Dossiers for Oncology Treatments: Evidence from Canada, the UK, and Australia.
Ball G; Levine MAH; Thabane L; Tarride JE
Curr Oncol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):7624-7636. PubMed ID: 36290879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Hanney S; Buxton M; Green C; Coulson D; Raftery J
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(53):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-180. PubMed ID: 18031652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.
Forbes C; Shirran L; Bagnall AM; Duffy S; ter Riet G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(28):1-110. PubMed ID: 11701100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment.
Raftery J; Roderick P; Stevens A
Health Technol Assess; 2005 May; 9(20):1-92, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15899148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies.
Ramsay CR; Grant AM; Wallace SA; Garthwaite PH; Monk AF; Russell IT
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(12):1-79. PubMed ID: 11319991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development.
Claxton K; Palmer S; Longworth L; Bojke L; Griffin S; McKenna C; Soares M; Spackman E; Youn J
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(46):1-323. PubMed ID: 23177626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronary artery stents in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease: a rapid and systematic review.
Meads C; Cummins C; Jolly K; Stevens A; Burls A; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(23):1-153. PubMed ID: 11074393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of surrogate outcomes in model-based cost-effectiveness analyses: a survey of UK Health Technology Assessment reports.
Taylor RS; Elston J
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jan; 13(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-50. PubMed ID: 19203465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What value health?: A review of health state values used in early technology assessments for NICE.
Stein K; Fry A; Round A; Milne R; Brazier J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 16466273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health technology assessment of public health interventions: an analysis of characteristics and comparison of methods-study protocol.
Mathes T; Willms G; Polus S; Stegbauer C; Messer M; Klingler C; Ehrenreich H; Niebuhr D; Marckmann G; Gerhardus A; Pieper D
Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):79. PubMed ID: 29792224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme.
Raftery J; Hanney S; Greenhalgh T; Glover M; Blatch-Jones A
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Oct; 20(76):1-254. PubMed ID: 27767013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [HTA goes Europe: European collaboration on joint assessment and methodological issues becomes reality].
Nachtnebel A; Mayer J; Erdös J; Lampe K; Kleijnen S; Schnell-Inderst P; Wild C
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):291-9. PubMed ID: 26354129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review of endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps.
Dalziel K; Stein K; Round A; Garside R; Royle P
Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(17):iii, 1-159. PubMed ID: 12969541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.
Amato L; Fusco D; Acampora A; Bontempi K; Rosa AC; Colais P; Cruciani F; D'Ovidio M; Mataloni F; Minozzi S; Mitrova Z; Pinnarelli L; Saulle R; Soldati S; Sorge C; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Davoli M
Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. PubMed ID: 29205995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
