These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15588744)

  • 1. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
    Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation.
    Han B; Enas NH; McEntegart D
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3329-46. PubMed ID: 19739238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
    Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
    Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.
    Toorawa R; Adena M; Donovan M; Jones S; Conlon J
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 18756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.
    Weir CJ; Lees KR
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of randomization techniques for clinical trials with data from the HOMERUS-trial.
    Verberk WJ; Kroon AA; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Van Ree JW; Lenders JW; Thien T; Bakx JC; Van Montfrans GA; Smit AJ; Beltman FW; De Leeuw PW
    Blood Press; 2005; 14(5):306-14. PubMed ID: 16257877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
    Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
    Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
    Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studies with group treatments required special power calculations, allocation methods, and statistical analyses.
    Faes MC; Reelick MF; Perry M; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 21856120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generic minimization random allocation and blinding system on web.
    Cai H; Xia J; Xu D; Gao D; Yan Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):706-19. PubMed ID: 16616696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The "best balance" allocation led to optimal balance in cluster-controlled trials.
    de Hoop E; Teerenstra S; van Gaal BG; Moerbeek M; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 21840173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic treatment allocation adjusting for prognostic factors for more than two treatments.
    Dror S; Faraggi D; Reiser B
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1338-43. PubMed ID: 8589225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Treatment by drawing lots in a therapeutic trial with a balance distribution of prognostic factors: the minimization method].
    Mollié A; Hill C
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1988; 36(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 3045921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequentially adjusted randomization to force balance in controlled trials with unknown prevalence of covariates: application to alcoholism research.
    Müller MJ; Scheurich A; Wetzel H; Szegedi A; Hautzinger M
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 15642723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation.
    Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):701-23. PubMed ID: 22161821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
    Schouten HJ
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Designing for cancer clinical trials: selection of prognostic factors.
    Brown BW
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1980; 64(2-3):499-502. PubMed ID: 7407790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IRINI: random group allocation of multiple prognostic factors.
    Kasturi J; Geisler JG; Liu J; Kirchner T; Amaratunga D; Lubomirski M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 21187163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.